Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38213856›Full record

ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal2023

Mechanical Gains Associated With Virtual Prophylactic Intramedullary Nail Fixation in Femurs With Metastatic Disease.

Joshua E Johnson, Ana V Figueroa, Marc J Brouillette, Benjamin J Miller, Jessica E Goetz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 60% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua E JohnsonDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Ana V FigueroaDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Marc J BrouilletteDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Benjamin J MillerDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Jessica E GoetzDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) of the femur undergo prophylactic surgical fixation for impending pathologic fractures; intramedullary nailing (IMN) being the most common fixation type. However, surgeons often question if IMN fixation provides sufficient improvements in mechanical strength for particular metastatic lesions. Our goal was to use patient-specific finite element (FE) modeling to computationally evaluate the effects of simulated IMN fixation on the mechanics of femurs affected with MBD. Methods: Computed tomography (CT) scans were available retrospectively from 48 patients (54 femurs) with proximal femoral metastases. The CT scans were used to create patient-specific, non-linear, voxel-based FE models of the femur, simulating the instant of peak hip joint contact force during normal walking. FE analyses were repeated after incorporating virtual IMN fixation (Smith and Nephew, TRIGEN INTERTAN) into the same femurs. Femur strength and load-to-strength ratio (LSR; lower LSR indicates lower fracture risk) were compared between untreated and IMN conditions using statistical analyses. Results: IMN fixation resulted in a very modest average 10% increase in mechanical strength (p<0.001), which was associated with a slight 7% reduction in fracture risk (p<0.001). However, there was considerable variation in fracture risk reduction between individual femurs (0.13-50%). In femurs with the largest reduction in fracture risk (>10%), IMN hardware directly passed through a considerable section of that femur's metastatic lesion. Femurs with lytic (10%) and diffuse (9%) metastases tended to have greater reductions in fracture risk compared to femurs with blastic (5%) and mixed (4%) metastases (p=0.073). Conclusion: Given the mechanically strong baseline condition of most femurs in this cohort, evident by the low fracture risk at the time of CT scanning, the relative increase in stiffness with the addition of the IMN hardware may not make a substantial contribution to overall mechanical strength. The mechanical gains of IMN fixation in femurs with MBD appear most beneficial when the hardware traverses an adequate section of the lesion.

Indexed as

Femoral FracturesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryBone NailsFemurHumansRetrospective Studiesfemur strengthfinite element analysismechanical fracture riskmetastatic bone diseaseprophylactic intramedullary nailing

Identifiers

PMID38213856
PMCPMC10777699
OpenAlexW4390793543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.