Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38213804›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2023

Ophthalmic artery reversal predicts contralateral body weakness symptoms better than carotid Doppler velocity-preliminary results.

Anne E Moore, Laligam N Sekhar, Kirk W Beach

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne E MooreHarborview Medical Center, Cerebrovascular Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Laligam N SekharDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kirk W BeachDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Harborview Medical Center · USNeurological Surgery · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The measurement of blood velocity in the carotid artery has been the most popular noninvasive method of identifying and classifying carotid stenosis for half a century. Carotid stenosis is an indicator of elevated risk of stroke; anatomic revascularization reduces the chance of stroke by more than half. Controversy persists on how patients with severe carotid stenosis should be selected for anatomic revascularization. Patients with a connected circle of Willis (coW) might not benefit from anatomic revascularization; patients with two segments missing in the coW are most likely to benefit from revascularization. Methods: Based on this analysis of data from carotid duplex examinations and transcranial Doppler examinations including ophthalmic artery (OA) direction in 28 patients, a refined carotid examination protocol is proposed. This refinement includes Doppler measurement of OA flow direction and documentation of internal carotid artery (ICA) bruit in addition to the adoption of an ICA peak systolic velocity (PSV) criterion exceeding 350 cm/s for identification of the patient most likely to benefit from carotid stenosis treatment. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of OA direction or carotid bruit are 84.6%±5.4%, 71.4%±2.1% and for PSV >350 cm/s are 84.6%±5.4%, 59.5%±2.3% for predicting contralateral body weakness. Conclusions: The proposed examination can be performed with the same duplex scanner and scan head currently used for carotid examinations with little additional time.

Indexed as

Carotidophthalmic artery (OA)stroke prevention

Identifiers

PMID38213804
PMCPMC10777211
OpenAlexW4389955688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.