ArticleNeuroprotection (Chichester, England)2023
Mononuclear cell therapy of neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in preclinical versus clinical studies: a systematic analysis of therapeutic efficacy and study design.
Article in Neuroprotection (Chichester, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: From the Limitations of Therapeutic Hypothermia to Precision Intervention.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Mononuclear cell therapy of neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in preclinical versus clinical studies: a systematic analysis of therapeutic efficacy and study design.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a devastating condition affecting around 8.5 in 1000 newborns globally. Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) can reduce mortality and, to a limited extent, disability after HIE. Nevertheless, there is a need for new and effective treatment strategies. Cell based treatments using mononuclear cells (MNC), which can be sourced from umbilical cord blood, are currently being investigated. Despite promising preclinical results, there is currently no strong indicator for clinical efficacy of the approach. This analysis aimed to provide potential explanations for this discrepancy. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Preclinical and clinical studies were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov using a predefined search strategy. A total of 17 preclinical and 7 clinical studies were included. We analyzed overall MNC efficacy in preclinical trials, the methodological quality of preclinical trials and relevant design features in preclinical versus clinical trials. Results: There was evidence for MNC therapeutic efficacy in preclinical models of HIE. The methodological quality of preclinical studies was not optimal, and statistical design quality was particularly poor. However, methodological quality was above the standard in other fields. There were significant differences in preclinical versus clinical study design including the use of TH as a baseline treatment (only in clinical studies) and much higher MNC doses being applied in preclinical studies. Conclusions: Based on the analyzed data, it is unlikely that therapeutic effect size is massively overestimated in preclinical studies. It is more plausible that the many design differences between preclinical and clinical trials are responsible for the so far lacking proof of efficacy of MNC treatments in HIE. Additional preclinical and clinical research is required to optimize the application of MNC for experimental HIE treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.