ArticlePeerJ2024
A nonlinear total variation based computed tomography (CT) image reconstruction method using gradient reinforcement.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A TV-BM3D Iterative Algorithm for VMAT-CT Reconstruction.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compressed sensing-based reconstruction algorithms have been proven to be more successful than analytical or iterative methods for sparse computed tomography (CT) imaging by narrowing down the solution set thanks to its ability to seek a sparser solution. Total variation (TV), one of the most popular sparsifiers, exploits spatial continuity of features by restricting variation between two neighboring pixels in each direction as using partial derivatives. When the number of projections is much fewer than the one in conventional CT, which results in much less sampling rate than the minimum required one, TV may not provide satisfactory results. In this study, a new regularizer is proposed which seeks for a sparser solution by reinforcing the gradient of TV and empowering the spatial continuity of features. The experiments are done by using both analitical phantom and real human CT images and the results are compared with conventional, four-directional, and directional TV algorithms by using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) metrics. Both quantitative and visual evaluations show that the proposed method is promising for sparse CT image reconstruction by reducing the background noise while preserving the features and edges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.