ArticlePEC innovation2023
Development of the
Article in PEC innovation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore the information needs and preferences of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients to guide next steps for development of a new online resource for this audience. The goals were to understand information needs, prioritize topic areas, and inform website design and functionality. Methods: Participants were AYA cancer patients ages 13-25 years. We used multiple methods in two phases to gather audience feedback. The first phase collected quantitative data in an electronic survey ( Results: Survey results showed AYA patients were more interested in content about how treatments would impact their lives rather than the treatments themselves. They preferred content on school, careers, relationships, independence, side effects, and fertility. The focus groups indicated AYA patients prefer a clean, stylish design; infographics and visual aids; and the ability to find information quickly and control the amount they read. Conclusions: Online resources represent an important opportunity to advance cancer education for AYA patients. However, it is important to consider the information needs and preferences of this audience in content design and delivery. Innovation: Practitioners should use stakeholder input to guide the creation of patient education resources that are age- and audience-appropriate. This study provides insights into AYA information needs and preferences in pediatric oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.