ArticleiScience2024
Automated graptolite identification at high taxonomic resolution using residual networks.
Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Graptolites, fossils significant for evolutionary studies and shale gas exploration, are traditionally identified visually by taxonomists due to their intricate morphologies and preservation challenges. Artificial intelligence (AI) holds great promise for transforming such meticulous tasks. In this paper, we demonstrate that graptolites can be identified with taxonomist accuracy using a deep learning model. We construct the most sophisticated and largest professional single organisms image dataset to date, which is composed of >34,000 images of 113 graptolite species annotated at pixel-level resolution to train the model, develop, and evaluate deep learning networks to classify graptolites. The model's performance surpassed taxonomists in accuracy, time, and generalization, achieving 86% and 81% accuracy in identifying graptolite genus and species, respectively. This AI-based method, capable of recognizing minute morphological details better than taxonomists, can be integrated into web and mobile apps, extending graptolite identification beyond research institutes and enhancing shale gas exploration efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.