Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38213536›Full record

ReviewExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2023

Current implications and challenges of artificial intelligence technologies in therapeutic intervention of colorectal cancer.

Kriti Das, Maanvi Paltani, Pankaj Kumar Tripathi, Rajnish Kumar, Saniya Verma, Subodh Kumar, Chakresh Kumar Jain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kriti DasDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Precision Medicine, School of Allied Health Sciences and Management, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi 110017, India.
Maanvi PaltaniDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Precision Medicine, School of Allied Health Sciences and Management, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi 110017, India.
Pankaj Kumar TripathiDepartment of Biotechnology, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Noida 201309, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rajnish KumarDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, Delhi 110017, India.
Saniya VermaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, Delhi 110017, India.
Subodh KumarDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, Delhi 110017, India.
Chakresh Kumar JainDepartment of Biotechnology, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Noida 201309, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irrespective of men and women, colorectal cancer (CRC), is the third most common cancer in the population with more than 1.85 million cases annually. Fewer than 20% of patients only survive beyond five years from diagnosis. CRC is a highly preventable disease if diagnosed at the early stage of malignancy. Several screening methods like endoscopy (like colonoscopy; gold standard), imaging examination [computed tomographic colonography (CTC)], guaiac-based fecal occult blood (gFOBT), immunochemical test from faeces, and stool DNA test are available with different levels of sensitivity and specificity. The available screening methods are associated with certain drawbacks like invasiveness, cost, or sensitivity. In recent years, computer-aided systems-based screening, diagnosis, and treatment have been very promising in the early-stage detection and diagnosis of CRC cases. Artificial intelligence (AI) is an enormously in-demand, cost-effective technology, that uses various tools machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) to screen, diagnose, and stage, and has great potential to treat CRC. Moreover, different ML algorithms and neural networks [artificial neural network (ANN), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and support vector machines (SVMs)] have been deployed to predict precise and personalized treatment options. This review examines and summarizes different ML and DL models used for therapeutic intervention in CRC cancer along with the gap and challenges for AI.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencecolorectal cancerdeep learningdrug discoverymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38213536
PMCPMC10776591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.