ArticleClinical kidney journal2024
Sex disparities in the utilization of nurse-assisted peritoneal dialysis: a mediation analysis using data from the REIN registry.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- International comparison of home dialysis uptake: a multi-registry analysis from the INTEGRATED Research Group.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study was carried out to evaluate the association between patient sex and the proportion of nurse-assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD) at dialysis initiation and to explore whether sex disparities in nurse-assisted PD utilization was explained by predialysis care and/or by social deprivation using mediation analysis. Methods: This was a retrospective study using data from the Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry linked to the French National Healthcare Database (SNDS) of incident patients between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2018. A regression logistic was used for statistical analysis. A mediation analysis explored the direct effect of sex on nurse-assisted PD proportion and the indirect effect through the European Deprivation Index (EDI), and the number of general practitioner (GP) and nephrologist visits before dialysis initiation. Results: Among 1706 patients on PD, there were 637 women (37.3%) and 1069 men (62.7%). Nurse-assisted PD proportion was 332/610 (54.4%) for women vs 464/1036 (44.8%) for men. In the multivariable analysis women were more likely to be treated by nurse-assisted PD {odds ratio (OR) 1.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46-2.52]}. Nurse-assisted PD was associated with the median number of GP visits [OR 1.44 (95% CI 1.11-1.86)] and with the median number of nephrologist visits [OR 0.59 (95% CI 0.46-0.76)]. The mediation analysis showed a direct effect of sex on nurse-assisted PD [OR 1.90 (95% CI 1.80-2.01)] and an indirect effect through the median number of GP visits [OR 1.05 (95% CI 1.04-1.06], the median number of nephrologist visits [OR 1.02 (95% CI 1.02-1.03)] and quintile 5 of the EDI [OR 1.03 (95% CI 1.02-1.03)]. Conclusion: Women were more frequently treated by nurse-assisted PD than men. Differences between women and men in predialysis care and social deprivation could explain the greater utilization of nurse-assisted PD among women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.