Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38213450›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2023

PEG-chitosan (Neuro-PEG) induced restoration of motor function after complete transection of the dorsal spinal cord in swine. A pilot study.

Michael Lebenstein-Gumovski, Alexander Zharchenko, Tanzila Rasueva, Robert Bashahanov, Dmitry A Kovalev, Andrey Zhirov, Anton Shatokhin, Andrey Grin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Establishment of a canine model of vascularized allogeneic spinal cord transplantation and preliminary study on spinal cord continuity reconstruction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael Lebenstein-GumovskiDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Stavropol State Medical University, Stavropol, Russian Federation.
Alexander ZharchenkoDepartment of General Medicine, Stavropol State Medical University, Stavropol, Russian Federation.
Tanzila RasuevaClinic of Neurosurgery, N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Robert BashahanovDepartment of General Medicine, Stavropol State Medical University, Stavropol, Russian Federation.
Dmitry A KovalevBiochemistry Lab, Stavropol Research Institute for Plague Control, Stavropol, Russian Federation.
Andrey ZhirovBiochemistry Lab, Stavropol Research Institute for Plague Control, Stavropol, Russian Federation.
Anton ShatokhinDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Stavropol State Medical University, Stavropol, Russian Federation.
Andrey GrinClinic of Neurosurgery, N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Stavropol State Medical University · RUResearch Institute of Emergency Care · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) remains an unmet medical need. Recently, fusogens, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), have been proven effective in restoring sensorimotor function after complete transection of the spinal cord at different levels and in different species. Here, we report on the use of a PEG-chitosan combo in a different animal model (swine). Methods: Five Hungarian Mangalica pigs were subjected to complete transection of the thoracic cord (T7-9). Three animals were treated with locally injected PEG-chitosan (Neuro-PEG) gel; two acted as controls. PEG-600 was also injected intra- and post-operatively intravenously. Animals were submitted to rehabilitation, including electrical myostimulation. Results were assessed after 60 days using the Individual Limb Motor Score, the Porcine Thoracic Spinal Cord Injured Behavioral Scale, and the modified motor Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan scale; sensory and sphincter functions were also assessed. Animals underwent Results: Starting on postoperative day (POD) 2, neuro-PEG-treated animals evinced the first signs of recovery, and on POD 60, they could all support their weight and were mobile. Controls never recovered any useful function. Fluorescence microscopy in the experimental group revealed axons passing through the site of injury, while degenerative post-traumatic changes were noted in controls. Conclusion: Neuro-PEG affords sensorimotor recovery after complete spinal cord transection. This opens the door to human experimentation, including trials of spinal cord transplantation.

Indexed as

ChitosanFusogensFusogen-sealantsNeuro-PEGPEG-chitosanPolyethylene glycolSpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID38213450
PMCPMC10783697
OpenAlexW4389686079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.