Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38213441›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2023

Late intrathecal retraction of a lumboperitoneal shunt.

Young Ju Kim, Atsushi Fujita, Masahiro Maeyama, Tatsuo Hori, Kazuhiro Tanaka, Takashi Sasayama

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 78% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Young Ju KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Atsushi FujitaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Masahiro MaeyamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Tatsuo HoriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Kazuhiro TanakaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Takashi SasayamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Kobe University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lumboperitoneal (LP) shunt placement is a good option for treating elderly patients with communicating normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) who are also on antiplatelet therapy following endovascular treatment of unruptured bilateral internal carotid artery aneurysms. Here, in an 80-year-old male with an LP shunt, the catheter was "pinched" between adjacent spinous processes, resulting in laceration of the catheter and intrathecal catheter migration. Case Description: An 80-year-old male was treated with a LP shunt for NPH 1 year after undergoing endovascular treatment of unruptured bilateral internal carotid artery aneurysms. The lumbar catheter was placed at the L2-3 level. Six months later, when he clinically deteriorated, the follow-up computed tomography showed recurrent ventricular enlargement. Further, studies additionally confirmed intrathecal migration of the lumbar catheter, warranting secondary ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. Conclusion: Patients with LP shunts may develop lumbar catheter lacerations secondary to a "pinching" effect from adjacent spinous processes, resulting in intrathecal catheter migration.

Indexed as

Catheter ruptureIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalusIntrathecal migrationLumboperitoneal shuntVentricular shunt

Identifiers

PMID38213441
PMCPMC10783681
OpenAlexW4389482077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.