Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38213399›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2024

Accountable Care Organizations and Specialists: Opportunities for Neurologists.

Robert E Mechanic, Stephen Shortell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert E MechanicHeller School for Social Policy and Management (REM), Brandeis University, Waltham, MA; Institute for Accountable Care (REM), Washington, DC; and School of Public Health (SS), University of California Berkeley.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5112-0870
Stephen ShortellHeller School for Social Policy and Management (REM), Brandeis University, Waltham, MA; Institute for Accountable Care (REM), Washington, DC; and School of Public Health (SS), University of California Berkeley.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7392-9801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 700,000 physicians and advanced practice clinicians participate in Medicare ACOs, which is responsible for the cost and quality of care for more than 13 million beneficiaries. Nearly 40 percent of neurologists who treat Medicare patients are already in an ACO. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services is now implementing a strategy for value-based specialty care that promotes active ACO management of specialty services while some ACOs are starting to direct referrals to preferred specialist networks. Neurologists can benefit from engaging with ACOs through enhanced patient data, an emphasis on team-based care, care coordination support for their patients, and financial rewards for performance. Neurologists can help ACOs as the population ages, including by helping ensure appropriate use of expensive new therapies for neurologic conditions.

Identifiers

PMID38213399
PMCPMC10781562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.