Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38213364›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

The Functional Outcome of Limb Salvage of Proximal Femur Tumors With Modular Endoprosthesis: A Prospective Study.

Hiranya Kumar, Karthik N Mittemari, VamshiKrishna Chand Nimmagadda, Ajith T Abraham, Shivaraj Nadagouda, Deepank Choudry

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Total femur replacement: function, quality of life, and gait: a multicentric EMSOS study.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiranya KumarTrauma and Orthopedics, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, IND.
Karthik N MittemariOrthopedics, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, IND.
VamshiKrishna Chand NimmagaddaOrthopedics, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, IND.
Ajith T AbrahamOrthopedic Surgery, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, IND.
Shivaraj NadagoudaOrthopedics, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, IND.
Deepank ChoudryOrthopedics, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, IND.
Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The proximal femur is a common site for primary bone sarcomas, including Ewing's sarcoma, chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, and giant cell tumors (GCT). Extensive resections are challenging to reconstruct because the size of the tumor may necessitate an extensive resection of the femur to achieve adequate oncologic clearance. The resection of the proximal femur can result in hip joint instability due to the loss of the strong native hip capsule or hip abductor strength. With a wide range of reconstruction options, such as resection arthrodesis, allograft-prosthetic composite (APC), and endoprosthesis, we can achieve limb salvage with good functional outcomes. Objective The objective of this case series is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications associated with endoprosthesis replacement in patients with proximal femur tumors. Methods A prospective analysis was conducted with 32 patients who underwent modular endoprosthesis replacement for proximal femoral tumors at our institution. Patient data, tumor characteristics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results The study involved 32 patients who met the inclusion criteria. They were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS), which showed good functional outcomes in 72.84% of the patients. The study highlights the functional outcomes and potential complications associated with the use of modular prostheses. Conclusion Endoprosthesis replacement in proximal femur tumors is a viable treatment option, providing good functional outcomes and an acceptable method for limb salvage, which enhances the quality of life.

Indexed as

bone tumor and limb salvagefunctional outcomemodular endoprosthesismstsproximal femur tumors

Identifiers

PMID38213364
PMCPMC10782409
OpenAlexW4389617560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.