Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38213360›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Resolution of Marked Bradycardia Following Angioplasty.

Khudheeja A Ahmed, Juwayria Ahmed, Mohammed Habeeb Ahmed

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khudheeja A AhmedDepartment of Research, Kaaj Healthcare, San Jose, USA.
Juwayria AhmedDepartment of Research, Kaaj Healthcare, San Jose, USA.
Mohammed Habeeb AhmedDepartment of Cardiology, Kaaj Healthcare, San Jose, USA.
Emory Healthcare · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bradycardia, a condition commonly managed conservatively and, subsequently, with pacemaker implantation presents a unique challenge when coexisting with coronary artery disease (CAD). This case report delves into an unusual scenario where bradycardia and its related symptoms resolved following coronary angioplasty. Our goal is to contribute valuable data to the argument for a comprehensive evaluation of bradycardic patients for underlying CAD prior to considering pacemaker implantation. This approach aims to prevent unnecessary pacemaker implantations and offers insights into the optimal management of patients presenting with both arrhythmia and CAD. The unusual resolution of bradycardia in this case underscores the importance of considering CAD as a possible underlying factor in bradycardic patients, prompting a reevaluation of conventional treatment protocols. By documenting this exceptional case, the authors advocate a more nuanced and individualized treatment strategy in the management of bradycardia, emphasizing the need to assess and address CAD as part of the diagnostic workup.

Indexed as

angioplastybradycardiacase reportcoronary artery diseasepercutaneous coronary intervention (pci)resolutionsick sinus syndromesinus pause

Identifiers

PMID38213360
PMCPMC10783991
OpenAlexW4389639711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.