Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38213348›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: An Overview.

Laura M Saunders, Hushil S Sandhu, Lorcán McBride, Vindhya S Maniarasu, Samantha Taylor, Rakesh Dhokia

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without anchoring: a multicenter comparison of stand-alone porous titanium versus anchored PEEK interbody cages.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Choosing the right treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The apparent diffusion coefficient based on small-field DWI is superior to T2-weighted imaging in evaluating neurological dysfunction of degenerative cervical myelopathy.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura M SaundersSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, GBR.
Hushil S SandhuDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, GBR.
Lorcán McBrideSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, GBR.
Vindhya S ManiarasuDepartment of Medicine, Royal Infirmary Hospital, Edinburgh, GBR.
Samantha TaylorSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, GBR.
Rakesh DhokiaDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, GBR.
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBRoyal Victoria Hospital · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a spinal condition of growing importance due to its increasing prevalence within the ageing population. DCM involves the degeneration of the cervical spine due to various processes such as disc ageing, osteophyte formation, ligament hypertrophy or ossification, as well as coexisting congenital anomalies. This article provides an overview of the literature on DCM and considers areas of focus for future research. A patient with DCM can present with a variety of symptoms ranging from mild hand paraesthesia and loss of dexterity to a more severe presentation of gait disturbance and loss of bowel/bladder control. Hoffman's sign and the inverted brachioradialis reflex are also important signs of this disease. The gold standard imaging modality is MRI which can identify signs of degeneration of the cervical spine. Other modalities include dynamic MRI, myelography, and diffusion tensor imaging. One important scoring system to aid with the diagnosis and categorisation of the severity of DCM is the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score. This considers motor, sensory, and bowel/bladder dysfunction, and categorises patients into mild, moderate, or severe DCM. DCM is primarily treated with surgery as this can halt disease progression and may even allow for neurological recovery. The surgical approach will depend on the location of degeneration, the number of cervical levels involved and the pathophysiological process. Surgical approach options include anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, corpectomy, or posterior approach (laminectomy ± fusion). Conservative management is also considered for some patients with mild or non-progressive DCM or for patients where surgery is not an option. Conservative treatment may include physical therapy, traction, or neck immobilisation. Future recommendations include research into the prevalence rate of DCM and if there is a difference between populations. Further research on the benefit of conservative management for patients with mild or non-progressive DCM would be recommended.

Indexed as

anatomyanterior cervical discectomy fusiondegenerative cervical myelopathyliterature reviewmodified japanese orthopaedic association scoremusculoskeletal imagingposterior cervical decompression and fusionspinal surgery complicationsurgical management of spine

Identifiers

PMID38213348
PMCPMC10783125
OpenAlexW4389614953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.