ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2024
Actual Amount Adsorbed as Estimated from the Surface Excess Isotherm.
Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gas and Liquid Isotherms: The Need for a Common Foundation.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025Review
- Multistage Template-Oriented Design and Tailoring of the Hierarchical Porous Biocarbon Materials for High-Performance Supercapacitors.ACS omega · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The amount of adsorption at equilibrium is commonly used for reporting solid/solution isotherms, despite the admonishment by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) against equating the surface excess (i.e., the measurable quantity for sorption, signifying the competitive sorption of adsorbate and solvent) with the actual amount adsorbed. The consensus, more generally stated, is that the surface excess cannot be divided into individual isotherms for sorbate and solvent unless simplifying model assumptions are introduced. Here we show, contrary to the IUPAC report, that there exists a simple method for assigning the total isotherm to the sorbate's actual amount adsorbed and to the individual solute isotherm. This requires a combination of isotherm and volumetric measurements. For dilute sorbates, we establish criteria to show if the total isotherm is dominated by the amount of sorption at the interface, in agreement with the common assumption in the practical literature. In the absence of the volume data, we propose an approximate yet more versatile method based on the specific surface area to carry out order-of-magnitude analysis to examine whether the actual amount adsorbed dominates surface excess. Application of our methods to the adsorption of sodium decyl sulfate on polystyrene latex, malachite green on activated carbons, and thiophenes on a metal-organic framework all demonstrated the dominance of the actual amount adsorbed, significantly simplifying isotherm analysis in terms of the underlying interactions (i.e., surface-sorbate and net self-interactions at the interface), eliminating the need for excess surface quantities. Analysis of fully miscible solvent-sorbate isotherms (e.g., the mixtures of organic solvents adsorbed on mesoporous silica and carbonaceous adsorbents) indicates the contributions from both sorbate and solvent isotherms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.