ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024
Evaluating Modified Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Enhanced Postoperative Recovery in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Patients.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diffusion and clearance of ropivacaine after serratus anterior plane block by CT imaging: a prospective, single-arm trial.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Postoperative Analgesic Techniques in Thoracoscopic Lung Resection Patients.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
- The feasibility and effectiveness of one-puncture of rectus sheath block combined with transverse abdominis plane block in patients undergoing thoracoscopic-laparoscopic radical esophagectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thoracoscopic lobectomy is accompanied by intense trauma and pain due to impaired chest wall integrity. We aimed to introduce a modified ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (MUG-SAPB) for postoperative analgesia in patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy, and to determine whether it could effectively alleviate postoperative pain and improve recovery quality. MATERIAL AND METHODS Overall, 78 patients randomly received either combined MUG-SAPB (0.25% ropivacaine, 10 mg dexamethasone, 40 mL) with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) or received PCIA alone. The primary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest and during movement at 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included use of opioids during surgery, numbers of rescue analgesics (butorphanol), frequency of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), comfort score within 24 h postoperatively, and postoperative complications within 72 h. RESULTS Compared to the PCIA group, in the MUG-SAPB group, resting VAS scores at 4-24 h (P<0.05) and movement VAS scores at 4-12 h postoperatively (P<0.05) were lower; intraoperative use of sufentanil and frequency of PCA were less, and less rescue analgesia was used (P=0.02, P=0.04 and P=0.03, respectively). Patients in the MUG-SAPB group had faster first mobilization (P=0.04). The MUG-SAPB group had higher comfort scores than the PCIA group (P=0.03). None of the MUG-SAPB patients had any SAPB-related complications. CONCLUSIONS MUG-SAPB effectively relieved postoperative pain, reduced opioid consumption, and accelerated early ambulation in comparison with PCIA alone in patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.