Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38212946›Full record

ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2024

Criteria and Indicators for Centers of Clinical Excellence in Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation: A Global Consensus Facilitated by ISRRA.

Rachel C Stockley, Marion F Walker, Margit Alt Murphy, Noor Azah Abd Aziz, Philemon Amooba, Leonid Churliov, Amanda Farrin, Natalie A Fini, Emma Ghaziani, Erin Godecke and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Lived Experiences of Returning to Participation After Mild Stroke: A Phenomenological Study in Spain.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 11 countries.

Rachel C StockleyStroke Research Team, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4441-6860
Marion F WalkerSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Margit Alt MurphyInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Rehabilitation Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3192-7787
Noor Azah Abd AzizDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, National University of Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Malaysia.
Philemon AmoobaDepartment of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Leonid ChurliovMelbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Amanda FarrinClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Natalie A FiniPhysiotherapy Department, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Emma GhazianiDepartment of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital and Department of Brain and Spinal Cord Injury, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3591-0162
Erin GodeckeSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University and Sir Charles Gairdner Osborne Park Health Care Group, Joondalup, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7210-1295
Tania Gutierrez-PanchanaClinica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Concepción, Chile.
Jie JiaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4516-4629
Thoshenthri KandasamyCaring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Patrice LindsayHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.
John SolomonCentre for Comprehensive Stroke Rehabilitation and Research, Department of Physiotherapy, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Vincent ThijsDepartment of Medicine University of Melbourne, Department of Neurology Austin Health, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Tierney TindallMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Donna C TippettDepartments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neurology, and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Caroline WatkinsStroke Research Team, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Elizabeth LynchCaring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUFlinders University · AUUniversity of Lancashire · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBEdith Cowan University · AUFrederiksberg Hospital · DKFudan University · CNHeart and Stroke Foundation · CAJohns Hopkins University · USKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GHManipal Academy of Higher Education · INNational University of Malaysia · MYUniversidad del Desarrollo · CLUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the International Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Alliance is to create a world where worldwide collaboration brings major breakthroughs for the millions of people living with stroke. A key pillar of this work is to define globally relevant criteria for centers that aspire to deliver excellent clinical rehabilitation and generate exceptional outcomes for patients.

objectivesThis paper presents consensus work conducted with an international group of expert stroke recovery and rehabilitation researchers, clinicians, and people living with stroke to identify and define criteria and measurable indicators for Centers of Clinical Excellence (CoCE) in stroke recovery and rehabilitation. These were intentionally developed to be ambitious and internationally relevant, regardless of a country's development or income status, to drive global improvement in stroke services.

methodsCriteria and specific measurable indicators for CoCE were collaboratively developed by an international panel of stroke recovery and rehabilitation experts from 10 countries and consumer groups from 5 countries.

resultsThe criteria and associated indicators, ranked in order of importance, focused upon (i) optimal outcome, (ii) research culture, (iii) working collaboratively with people living with stroke, (iv) knowledge exchange, (v) leadership, (vi) education, and (vii) advocacy. Work is currently underway to user-test the criteria and indicators in 14 rehabilitation centers in 10 different countries.

conclusionsWe anticipate that use of the criteria and indicators could support individual organizations to further develop their services and, more widely, provide a mechanism by which clinical excellence can be articulated and shared to generate global improvements in stroke care.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationEducational StatusHumansRehabilitation Centersconsensusdelivery of healthcareleadershiporganizational culturerehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID38212946
PMCPMC10874109
OpenAlexW4390794202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.