SynthesisAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2024
Domain-specific cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Correlation of cognitive dysfunctions and diffusion tensor MRI measures in subjects with RRMS.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Validation of the Body Compassion Scale in multiple sclerosis.Rehabilitation psychology · 2026Article
- Volumetric MRI Markers of Cognitive Impairment in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Cerebellar White Matter Loss, Pallidum Atrophy, and Choroid Plexus Enlargement.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Odds of Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis Subtypes and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A Case-Control Study.Advanced biomedical research · 2025Article
- CSF synaptic biomarkers and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: from phenomenology to neurobiological mechanisms.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024Review
- Review
- A review of the validation of the Brief Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis in Latin America.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMethods of cognitive measurements in multiple sclerosis (MS) are not standardized. We aimed to identify the prevalence of cognitive domain-specific impairment (DSI) in MS by using subtests of the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests (BRB-N) with analyzing different cutoff values.
methodsThe systematic review and meta-analysis were registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021287004). The systematic literature search was performed via PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL on 24 October 2021. Inclusion criteria were adults of different MS subtypes (CIS, RRMS, PPMS, and SPMS) with the condition of distinct DSI measured by BRB-N. Pediatric MS, computerized versions of BRB-N, and patients receiving steroids were excluded. Primary outcome was pooled prevalence rates of impaired patients within each cutoff and MS subtype, with 95% confidence interval, I-squared statistics for heterogeneity, and chi-squared test for subgroup differences. Risk of bias was assessed using the "JBI Quality Assessment Tool for Prevalence Studies."
resultsIn 48 eligible observational studies (n = 3431 patients), the three most prevalent thresholds were the 2.0 SD and 1.5 SD below the mean of normative values, and the score below the fifth percentile of the normative values. A progressively increasing worsening of the overall DSI was observed from CIS, moving toward RRMS, PPMS, and SPMS.
interpretationCognitive impairment is observed in all MS phenotypes, with varying degrees. Due to several potential influencing factors, our comprehensive literature review has not revealed consistent findings, and we, therefore, recommend considering a more sophisticated, "individual referencing" approach, acknowledging the diverse clinical and sociodemographic characteristics among populations and disparities in cognitive testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.