Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38212855›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2024

Cobdock: an accurate and practical machine learning-based consensus blind docking method.

Sadettin Y Ugurlu, David McDonald, Huangshu Lei, Alan M Jones, Shu Li, Henry Y Tong, Mark S Butler, Shan He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Can Cavity Prediction Algorithms Help in Docking Experiments?Journal of computational chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. ADMET & DMPK · 2026
    Review
  5. The Human Omnibus of Targetable Pockets.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Chronicle Review ofIndian journal of microbiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sadettin Y UgurluSchool of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
David McDonaldAIA Insights Ltd, Birmingham, UK.
Huangshu LeiYaoPharma Co. Ltd., 100 Xingguang Avenue, Renhe Town, Yubei District, Chongqing, 401121, People's Republic of China.
Alan M JonesSchool of Pharmacy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Shu LiCentre for Artificial Intelligence Driven Drug Discovery, Macao Polytechnic University, R. de Luís Gonzaga Gomes, Macao, 5HV2+CP8, China.
Henry Y TongCentre for Artificial Intelligence Driven Drug Discovery, Macao Polytechnic University, R. de Luís Gonzaga Gomes, Macao, 5HV2+CP8, China.
Mark S ButlerAIA Insights Ltd, Birmingham, UK.
Shan HeSchool of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. s.he@cs.bham.ac.uk.
Macao Polytechnic University · MOUniversity of Birmingham · GBBharat Heavy Electricals (India) · IN

Funding

Turkish Government PhD sponsorship 64243970/150.02/10836324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probing the surface of proteins to predict the binding site and binding affinity for a given small molecule is a critical but challenging task in drug discovery. Blind docking addresses this issue by performing docking on binding regions randomly sampled from the entire protein surface. However, compared with local docking, blind docking is less accurate and reliable because the docking space is too largetly sampled. Cavity detection-guided blind docking methods improved the accuracy by using cavity detection (also known as binding site detection) tools to guide the docking procedure. However, it is worth noting that the performance of these methods heavily relies on the quality of the cavity detection tool. This constraint, namely the dependence on a single cavity detection tool, significantly impacts the overall performance of cavity detection-guided methods. To overcome this limitation, we proposed Consensus Blind Dock (CoBDock), a novel blind, parallel docking method that uses machine learning algorithms to integrate docking and cavity detection results to improve not only binding site identification but also pose prediction accuracy. Our experiments on several datasets, including PDBBind 2020, ADS, MTi, DUD-E, and CASF-2016, showed that CoBDock has better binding site and binding mode performance than other state-of-the-art cavity detector tools and blind docking methods.

Indexed as

Blind molecular dockingConsensus dockingCross-dockingDockingGlobal dockingHybrid dockingInverse-dockingProtein dockingReverse-dockingSmall molecule docking

Identifiers

PMID38212855
PMCPMC10785400
OpenAlexW4390734415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.