Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38212837›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Personalizing the first dose of FSH for IVF/ICSI patients through machine learning: a non-inferiority study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial.

Nuria Correa, Jesus Cerquides, Josep Lluis Arcos, Rita Vassena, Mina Popovic

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05948293 (Randomized Investigation With an AI Powered Medical Device to Select the First Dose of FSH for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05948293 nawithdrawnnot on this map

Randomized Investigation With an AI Powered Medical Device to Select the First Dose of FSH for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorClínica EUGINRan2024 to 2025Enrolled0ConditionsInfertilityArmsMachine learning model called IDoser, Standard clinical practice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nuria CorreaUniversitat Auntonoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Barcelona, 08193, Spain.
Jesus CerquidesArtificial Intelligence Research Institute, IIIA (CSIC), Campus de la UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona, 08193, Spain. cerquide@iiia.csic.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3752-644X
Josep Lluis ArcosArtificial Intelligence Research Institute, IIIA (CSIC), Campus de la UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona, 08193, Spain.
Rita VassenaClinica Eugin-Eugin Group, Carrer de Balmes 236, Barcelona, 08006, Spain.
Mina PopovicClinica Eugin-Eugin Group, Carrer de Balmes 236, Barcelona, 08006, Spain.
Artificial Intelligence Research Institute · ESInstitut de Biologia Molecular de Barcelona · ESUniversitat Oberta de Catalunya · ES

Funding

Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca DI-2019-24Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2019-104156GB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdequately selecting the initial follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) dose during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is key for success in assisted reproduction. The objective of COS is to obtain an optimal number of oocytes to increase the chances of achieving a pregnancy, while avoiding complications for the patient. Current clinical protocols do achieve good results for the majority of patients, but further refinements in individualized FSH dosing may reduce the risk of poor ovarian response while also limiting the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) risk. Models to select the first FSH dose in COS have been presented in literature with promising results. However, most have only been developed and tested in normo-ovulatory women under the age of 40 years.

methodsThis is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, single blinded, clinical trial. This study will be performed in 236 first cycle in vitro fertilization (IVF) and/or ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) patients, randomized 1:1 in two arms. In the intervention arm, the dose of FSH will be assigned by a machine learning (ML) model called IDoser, while in the control arm, the dose will be determined by the clinician following standard practice. Stratified block randomization will be carried out depending on the patient being classified as expected low responder, high responder, or normo-responder. Patients will complete their participation in the trial once the first embryo transfer result is known. The primary outcome of the study is the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved at ovarian pick up (OPU) and the hypothesis of non-inferiority of the intervention arm compared to the control. Secondary outcomes include the number of cycle cancelations (due to low response or no retrieval of mature oocytes), risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates per first transfer. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial to test clinical performance of an all-patient inclusive model to select the first dose of FSH for COS. Prospective trials for machine learning (ML) models in healthcare are scarce but necessary for clinical application.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05948293 . Registered on 14 July 2023.

Indexed as

Follicle Stimulating HormoneOvarian Hyperstimulation SyndromeAdultEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicOvulation InductionPregnancyPregnancy RateProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSemenSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicFollicle Stimulating HormoneArtificial intelligenceControlled ovarian stimulationDecision support systemFSHIVFMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38212837
PMCPMC10782678
OpenAlexW4390751548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.