Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38212796›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024

Megaprosthetic replacement in complex distal humerus fractures in elderly patients: a case series.

Matteo Caredda, Luigi Cianni, Andrea De Fazio, Antonio Ziranu, Raffaele Vitiello, Giulio Maccauro

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matteo CareddaDepartment of Ageing, Neurosciences, Head-Neck and Orthopedics Sciences, Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Luigi CianniDepartment of Ageing, Neurosciences, Head-Neck and Orthopedics Sciences, Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy. luigi_cianni@libero.it.
Andrea De FazioDepartment of Ageing, Neurosciences, Head-Neck and Orthopedics Sciences, Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Antonio ZiranuOrthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Raffaele VitielloDepartment of Ageing, Neurosciences, Head-Neck and Orthopedics Sciences, Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Giulio MaccauroDepartment of Ageing, Neurosciences, Head-Neck and Orthopedics Sciences, Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManaging distal humeral fractures can be challenging for orthopedic surgeons. There are several treatment options for managing this type of fracture, and the treatment method for these fractures should be based on patient-related factors. In elderly patients with osteoporotic bone and severe comminution of the fracture, adequate fixation can be a major challenge for surgeons. The use of megaprosthesis has been recently proposed in traumatology as an alternative to osteosynthesis or conventional prosthesis for the management of comminuted articular fractures in elderly patients with poor bone stock.

methodsA consecutive case series of 5 patients who underwent reconstruction of the elbow joint with a trabecular hinged modular elbow megaprosthesis was reviewed retrospectively. All patients included had AO/OTA 13C2 and 13C3 fractures with metaphyseal extension and considerable bone loss of the distal humerus. The primary outcome was the evaluation of functional and clinical outcomes with the MEPS score in comminuted distal humerus fractures with metaphyseal extension and poor bone stock in elderly patients treated with elbow megaprosthesis. The secondary outcome was assessing the treatment-related complication rate of this technique in non-oncological fields.

resultsFive patients were included in the study with a mean age of 82.66 ± 7.72 years at surgery. The mean MEPS value was 63 ± 24.2 at 1 month, 81 ± 23.53 at 3 months, 83 ± 24.2 at 6 months, and 84 ± 24.57 at 12 months. No intraoperative complications were recorded in our series. Of 5 patients, four patients had excellent clinical and functional outcomes. We did not encounter wound dehiscence, prosthetic joint infection, aseptic loosening, or periprosthetic fractures.

conclusionsThe indication for this type of treatment must be selected and narrowed down, as it is a salvage procedure, and any failure would cause even more complex situations. Short operating times and early mobilization of the elbow are the advantages of this technique.

Indexed as

Elbow JointFractures, ComminutedHumeral FracturesHumeral Fractures, DistalAgedAged, 80 and overFracture Fixation, InternalHumansHumerusRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDistal humerusDistal humerus fracturesElbowElbow replacementElderlyMegaprosthesesMegaprosthesis

Identifiers

PMID38212796
PMCPMC10782750
OpenAlexW4390747659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.