Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38212792›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2024

Risk-management decision-making data from a community-based sample of racially diverse women at high risk of breast cancer: rationale, methods, and sample characteristics of the Daughter Sister Mother Project survey.

Tasleem J Padamsee, Christina Bijou, Paige Swinehart-Hord, Megan Hils, Anna Muraveva, Rachel J Meadows, Kate Shane-Carson, Lisa D Yee, Celia E Wills, Electra D Paskett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tasleem J PadamseeDivision of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 280F Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43220, USA. padamsee.1@osu.edu.
Christina BijouDepartment of Sociology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Paige Swinehart-HordDivision of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 280F Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43220, USA.
Megan HilsDivision of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 280F Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43220, USA.
Anna MuravevaGovernment Resources Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Rachel J MeadowsCenter for Epidemiology and Healthcare Delivery Research, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Kate Shane-CarsonCollege of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Lisa D YeeCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Celia E WillsCollege of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Electra D PaskettJames Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
The Ohio State University · USCity of Hope · USJPS Health Network · USThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · US

Funding

Preventing Breast Cancer: Decisions and Effects among Women at Elevated RiskK01CA181547 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PADAMSEE, TASLEEM J · 2014 to 2018
$575k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA181547Susan G. Komen Training in Disparities Research Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo understand the dynamics that limit use of risk-management options by women at high risk of breast cancer, there is a critical need for research that focuses on patient perspectives. Prior research has left important gaps: exclusion of high-risk women not in risk-related clinical care, exclusion of non-white populations, and lack of attention to the decision-making processes that underlie risk-management choices. Our objective was to create a more inclusive dataset to facilitate research to address disparities related to decision making for breast cancer risk management.

methodsThe Daughter Sister Mother Project survey collects comprehensive information about the experiences of women at high risk of breast cancer. We collected novel measures of feelings about and reactions to cancer screenings; knowledge, barriers, and facilitators of risk-management options; beliefs related to cancer risk and risk management; and involvement with loved ones who had cancer. Eligible individuals were non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic Black adult women who self-identified as having high risk of breast cancer and had no personal history of cancer. Between October 2018 and August 2019, 1053 respondents completed the online survey. Of these, 717 were confirmed through risk prediction modeling to have a lifetime breast cancer risk of ≥ 20%. Sociodemographic characteristics of this sample were compared to those of nationally representative samples of the US population: the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey and the Pew Research Center report: Jewish Americans in 2020.

resultsThe sample of 717 women at objectively high risk of breast cancer was largely (95%) recruited from non-clinical sources. Of these respondents, only 31% had seen a genetic counselor, 34% had had genetic testing specific to breast cancer risk, and 35% had seen at least one breast or cancer care specialist. The sample includes 35% Black respondents and 8% with Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry. Although encompassing a substantial range of ages, incomes, and education levels, respondents are overall somewhat younger, higher-income, and more educated than the US population as a whole.

conclusionsThe DSM dataset offers comprehensive data from a community-based, diverse sample of women at high risk of breast cancer. The dataset includes substantial proportions of Black and Ashkenazi Jewish women and women who are not already in clinical care related to their breast cancer risk. This sample will facilitate future studies of risk-management behaviors among women who are and are not receiving high-risk care, and of variations in risk-management experiences across race and ethnicity.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMothersNuclear FamilyRisk ManagementSurveys and QuestionnairesBreast cancer preventionBreast cancer riskBreast cancer risk managementCancer health disparitiesCommunity-based sampleHealth disparitiesSurvey methodology

Identifiers

PMID38212792
PMCPMC10785448
OpenAlexW4390752877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.