ArticlePlant methods2024
Assessing data analysis techniques in a high-throughput meiosis-like induction detection system.
Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A cell-based fluorescent system and statistical framework to detect meiosis-like induction in plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStrategies to understand meiotic processes have relied on cytogenetic and mutant analysis. However, thus far in vitro meiosis induction is a bottleneck to laboratory-based plant breeding as factor(s) that switch cells in crops species from mitotic to meiotic divisions are unknown. A high-throughput system that allows researchers to screen multiple candidates for their meiotic induction role using low-cost microfluidic devices has the potential to facilitate the identification of factors with the ability to induce haploid cells that have undergone recombination (artificial gametes) in cell cultures.
resultsA data analysis pipeline and a detailed protocol are presented to screen for plant meiosis induction factors in a quantifiable and efficient manner. We assessed three data analysis techniques using spiked-in protoplast samples (simulated gametes mixed into somatic protoplast populations) of flow cytometry data. Polygonal gating, which was considered the "gold standard", was compared to two thresholding methods using open-source analysis software. Both thresholding techniques were able to identify significant differences with low spike-in concentrations while also being comparable to polygonal gating.
conclusionOur study provides details to test and analyze candidate meiosis induction factors using available biological resources and open-source programs for thresholding. RFP (PE.CF594.A) and GFP (FITC.A) were the only channels required to make informed decisions on meiosis-like induction and resulted in detection of cell population changes as low as 0.3%, thus enabling this system to be scaled using microfluidic devices at low costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.