ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Automated machine learning for early prediction of acute kidney injury in acute pancreatitis.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk prediction models for acute kidney injury in patients with acute pancreatitis: a systematic review.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Predictive models for acute kidney injury in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- APEX-NET: automated pancreatic evaluation network using early non-contrast CT.European radiology · 2026Article
- Leveraging chatgpt' s advanced data analysis for forensic science research and applications.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Automated machine learning model to predict anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury in patients with tuberculous meningitis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for acute kidney injury in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice: a retrospective matched cohort study.Renal failure · 2025Article
- AI and Machine Learning for Precision Medicine in Acute Pancreatitis: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Construction and validation of risk prediction models for renal replacement therapy in patients with acute pancreatitis.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Machine-learning-based prediction by stacking ensemble strategy for surgical outcomes in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Advances in the clinical application of machine learning in acute pancreatitis: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Explainable coronary artery disease prediction model based on AutoGluon from AutoML framework.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Interpretable machine learning for early prediction of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with acute pancreatitis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) represents a frequent and grave complication associated with acute pancreatitis (AP), substantially elevating both mortality rates and the financial burden of hospitalization. The aim of our study is to construct a predictive model utilizing automated machine learning (AutoML) algorithms for the early prediction of AKI in patients with AP.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients who were diagnosed with AP in our hospital from January 2017 to December 2021. These patients were randomly allocated into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3. To develop predictive models for each set, we employed the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm along with AutoML. A nomogram was developed based on multivariate logistic regression analysis outcomes. The model's efficacy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, the performance of the model constructed via AutoML was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA), feature importance, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) plots, and locally interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME).
resultsThis study incorporated a total of 437 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Out of these, 313 were assigned to the training cohort and 124 to the validation cohort. In the training and validation cohorts, AKI occurred in 68 (21.7%) and 29(23.4%) patients, respectively. Comparative analysis revealed that the AutoML models exhibited enhanced performance over traditional logistic regression (LR). Furthermore, the deep learning (DL) model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy, evidenced by an area under the ROC curve of 0.963 in the training set and 0.830 in the validation set, surpassing other comparative models. The key variables identified as significant in the DL model within the training dataset included creatinine (Cr), urea (Urea), international normalized ratio (INR), etiology, smoking, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), hypertension, prothrombin time (PT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and diabetes.
conclusionThe AutoML model, utilizing DL algorithm, offers considerable clinical significance in the early detection of AKI among patients with AP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.