Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38212745›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

Automated machine learning for early prediction of acute kidney injury in acute pancreatitis.

Rufa Zhang, Minyue Yin, Anqi Jiang, Shihou Zhang, Xiaodan Xu, Luojie Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rufa Zhang *Department of Gastroenterology, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Changshu NO.1 People's Hospital, No. 1 Shuyuan Street, 215500, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Minyue Yin *Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Anqi JiangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Changshu NO.1 People's Hospital, No. 1 Shuyuan Street, 215500, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Shihou ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Changshu NO.1 People's Hospital, No. 1 Shuyuan Street, 215500, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaodan XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Changshu NO.1 People's Hospital, No. 1 Shuyuan Street, 215500, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China. xxd20@163.com.
Luojie LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Changshu NO.1 People's Hospital, No. 1 Shuyuan Street, 215500, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China. luojieliu@126.com.
Soochow University · CN

Funding

Gusu Health Personnel Training Project GSWS2020109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) represents a frequent and grave complication associated with acute pancreatitis (AP), substantially elevating both mortality rates and the financial burden of hospitalization. The aim of our study is to construct a predictive model utilizing automated machine learning (AutoML) algorithms for the early prediction of AKI in patients with AP.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients who were diagnosed with AP in our hospital from January 2017 to December 2021. These patients were randomly allocated into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3. To develop predictive models for each set, we employed the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm along with AutoML. A nomogram was developed based on multivariate logistic regression analysis outcomes. The model's efficacy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, the performance of the model constructed via AutoML was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA), feature importance, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) plots, and locally interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME).

resultsThis study incorporated a total of 437 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Out of these, 313 were assigned to the training cohort and 124 to the validation cohort. In the training and validation cohorts, AKI occurred in 68 (21.7%) and 29(23.4%) patients, respectively. Comparative analysis revealed that the AutoML models exhibited enhanced performance over traditional logistic regression (LR). Furthermore, the deep learning (DL) model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy, evidenced by an area under the ROC curve of 0.963 in the training set and 0.830 in the validation set, surpassing other comparative models. The key variables identified as significant in the DL model within the training dataset included creatinine (Cr), urea (Urea), international normalized ratio (INR), etiology, smoking, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), hypertension, prothrombin time (PT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and diabetes.

conclusionThe AutoML model, utilizing DL algorithm, offers considerable clinical significance in the early detection of AKI among patients with AP.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryPancreatitisAcute DiseaseHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesUreaUreaAcute kidney injuryAcute pancreatitisAutomated machine learningCreatinineInternational normalized ratioPredictive models

Identifiers

PMID38212745
PMCPMC10785491
OpenAlexW4390753520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.