ArticleBMC nursing2024
Development and validation of a quality of healthy work environment instrument for shift nurses.
Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fostering Spiritually Supportive Work Environments in Healthcare: Leadership Recommendations From a Narrative Review.Journal of nursing management · 2026Review
- Do Nurses Thrive in Their Organization? Validation of the Short Form of Nurses' Organizational Health Questionnaire.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Guidelines for Reducing the Adverse Effects of Shift Work on Nursing Staff: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- ENVOLVER+: a tool for the promotion of positive nursing practice environments.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Nursing Practice Environments in Hospitals: A Comparative Study between Portugal and Brazil.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Development and Validation of the "Program to Promote Positive Nursing Practice Environments": Modified Delphi Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The influence of psychosocial work environment, personal perceived health and job crafting on nurses' well-being: a cross-sectional survey study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs the importance of a healthy work environment for nurses' good practice and patient safety has been recognized, there is a need to assess nurses' perceptions of the quality of a healthy work environment.
methodsA conceptual framework and construct components were extracted through a literature review and in-depth interviews with shift nurses. The initial items of the instrument were developed according to the conceptual attributes, and the items were selected through content validity by ten experts. Two hundred and forty-seven shift nurses participated in this study through face-to-face surveys to test the reliability and validity of the instrument. The evaluation was used for item and confirmatory factor analyses to assess the criterion-related validity and internal consistency of the instrument. Test-retest reliability was analyzed using data from thirty-two nurses.
resultsThe final instrument consisted of 23 items with five components identified through confirmatory factor analysis. Criterion-related validity was established using the K-PES-NWI (r = .54). Cronbach's alpha for the total items was 0.85, and test-retest reliability was 0.73.
conclusionThe quality of the healthy work environment instrument developed in this study was considered reliable and valid. The instrument developed in this study can be used to measure the quality of a healthy work environment as perceived by shift nurses and to identify preventive measures needed to improve the quality of the work environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.