Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38212732›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Sexual violence in nightlife and positive bystander intervention in an English city.

Zara Quigg, Rebecca Bates, Nadia Butler, Chloe Smith, Charley Wilson, Amanda Atkinson, Mark A Bellis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zara QuiggPublic Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, 3rd Floor Exchange Station, Liverpool, L3 2ET, UK. z.a.quigg@ljmu.ac.uk.
Rebecca BatesPublic Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, 3rd Floor Exchange Station, Liverpool, L3 2ET, UK.
Nadia ButlerPublic Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, 3rd Floor Exchange Station, Liverpool, L3 2ET, UK.
Chloe SmithPublic Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, 3rd Floor Exchange Station, Liverpool, L3 2ET, UK.
Charley WilsonPublic Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, 3rd Floor Exchange Station, Liverpool, L3 2ET, UK.
Amanda AtkinsonPublic Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, 3rd Floor Exchange Station, Liverpool, L3 2ET, UK.
Mark A BellisPublic Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, 3rd Floor Exchange Station, Liverpool, L3 2ET, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNightlife environments are high risk settings for sexual violence and bystander intervention programmes are being developed in response. However, more research is needed to understand nightlife-related sexual violence, and factors that influence bystander interventions. This study examined nightlife patron's experiences of sexual violence and associated factors; and relationships between attitudes towards, awareness and experience of sexual violence, and confidence to intervene.

methodsCross-sectional on-street survey of nightlife patrons (N = 307, aged 18+) on a night out in an English city. Surveys (7.30pm-1.30am; Wednesday-Saturday) established sexual violence awareness, myth acceptance, and experience, and confidence to intervene. Participant's socio-demographics, nightlife alcohol consumption, and frequency of nightlife usage were collected.

results58.0% had ever experienced sexual violence whilst on a night out. In adjusted analyses, sexual violence was higher amongst females (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 4.0; p < 0.001), and regular nightlife patrons (AOR 2.1; p < 0.05). The majority agreed that they would feel confident asking someone who has experienced sexual violence if they are okay/would like support (92.2%). In adjusted analyses, confidence to intervene was higher amongst those who agreed that sexual violence was an issue in nightlife (AOR 3.6; p < 0.05), however it reduced as sexual violence myth acceptance increased (AOR 0.5; p < 0.05).

conclusionSexual violence is a pertinent issue in nightlife. Programmes aiming to address nightlife-related sexual violence must address the wider social norms that promote sexual violence, and ensure patrons understand the extent and significance of the issue, to increase confidence to positively intervene.

Indexed as

Alcoholic IntoxicationSex OffensesAlcohol DrinkingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAlcoholNightlifePreventionSexualViolence

Identifiers

PMID38212732
PMCPMC10782665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.