Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38212693›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2024

Diagnostic accuracy of BASIC-Q for detection of cognitive impairment in a primary care setting - a cross-validation study.

Anne-Britt Oxbøll, Kasper Jørgensen, T Rune Nielsen, Sofie D Christiansen, Ann Nielsen, Frans B Waldorff, Gunhild Waldemar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Conversion between the Brief assessment of Impaired Cognition, Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition Questionnaire, and Mini-Mental State Examination in a mixed clinical sample.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Validation of the brief assessment of impaired cognition (BASIC) and brief assessment of impaired cognition questionnaire (BASIC-Q) in Italy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Dementia and metabolic syndrome: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne-Britt OxbøllDanish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital- Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. anne-britt.oxboell@regionh.dk.
Kasper JørgensenDanish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital- Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
T Rune NielsenDanish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital- Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sofie D ChristiansenSection of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ann NielsenDanish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital- Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frans B WaldorffSection of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gunhild WaldemarDanish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital- Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of a new, brief questionnaire, 'Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition- Questionnaire' (BASIC-Q) for detection of cognitive impairment, primarily developed for use in primary care. BASIC-Q has three components: Self-report, Informant report, and Orientation. Self-report and Orientation are completed by the individual and Informant report is answered by a close relative.

methodsWe included 275 participants ≥ 70 years, without a prior diagnosis of dementia, and with a close relative who agreed to participate as an informant. Participants were included prospectively in 14 general practices in urban and rural Denmark using a convenience sampling method. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), the informant-completed Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) and reported memory concern were used as a reference standard for the classification of the participants' cognitive function.

resultsBASIC-Q demonstrated a fair to good diagnostic accuracy to differentiate between people with cognitive impairment and normal cognition with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% CI 0.79-0.89) and a sensitivity and specificity of 0.80 (95% CI 0.72-0.87) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.63-0.78). A prorated BASIC-Q score derived from BASIC-Q without Informant report had significantly lower classification accuracy than the full BASIC-Q. The test-retest reliability of BASIC-Q was good with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.84.

conclusionBASIC-Q is a brief, easy-to-use questionnaire for identification of cognitive impairment in older adults. It demonstrated fair to good classification accuracy in a general practice setting and can be a useful case-finding tool when suspecting dementia in primary health care.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaAgedHumansNeuropsychological TestsPrimary Health CareReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and QuestionnairesCognitive assessment screening instrumentCognitive impairmentPrimary health careTest-retest reliabilityValidation study

Identifiers

PMID38212693
PMCPMC10785536
OpenAlexW4390754139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.