Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38212647›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

An augmentation aided concise CNN based architecture for COVID-19 diagnosis in real time.

Balraj Preet Kaur, Harpreet Singh, Rahul Hans, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, Chetna Kaushal, Md Mehedi Hassan, Mohd Asif Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Balraj Preet KaurDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, DAV University, Jalandhar, India.
Harpreet SinghDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, India.
Rahul HansDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, DAV University, Jalandhar, India.
Sanjeev Kumar SharmaDepartment of Computer Science and Applications, DAV University, Jalandhar, India.
Chetna KaushalChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, 140401, India.
Md Mehedi HassanComputer Science and Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna, 9208, Bangladesh.
Mohd Asif ShahDepartment of Economics, Kebri Dehar University, Kebri Dehar, 250, Ethiopia. drmohdasifshah@kdu.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 6.5 million people around the world have lost their lives due to the highly contagious COVID 19 virus. The virus increases the danger of fatal health effects by damaging the lungs severely. The only method to reduce mortality and contain the spread of this disease is by promptly detecting it. Recently, deep learning has become one of the most prominent approaches to CAD, helping surgeons make more informed decisions. But deep learning models are computation hungry and devices with TPUs and GPUs are needed to run these models. The current focus of machine learning research is on developing models that can be deployed on mobile and edge devices. To this end, this research aims to develop a concise convolutional neural network-based computer-aided diagnostic system for detecting the COVID 19 virus in X-ray images, which may be deployed on devices with limited processing resources, such as mobile phones and tablets. The proposed architecture aspires to use the image enhancement in first phase and data augmentation in the second phase for image pre-processing, additionally hyperparameters are also optimized to obtain the optimal parameter settings in the third phase that provide the best results. The experimental analysis has provided empirical evidence of the impact of image enhancement, data augmentation, and hyperparameter tuning on the proposed convolutional neural network model, which increased accuracy from 94 to 98%. Results from the evaluation show that the suggested method gives an accuracy of 98%, which is better than popular transfer learning models like Xception, Resnet50, and Inception.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneCOVID-19SurgeonsCOVID-19 TestingHumansHydrolasesSARS-CoV-2Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID38212647
PMCPMC10784465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.