ArticleBiochemical genetics2024
RFGR: Repeat Finder for Complete and Assembled Whole Genomes and NGS Reads.
Article in Biochemical genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Repetitive DNA sequences cause genomic instability and are important genetic markers. Identification of repeats is a critical step in genome annotation and analysis. On the other hand, repeats also pose a technical challenge for genome assembly and alignment programs using NGS data. RFGR is a comprehensive tool that can find exact repetitive sequences in complete genomes and assembled genomes, as well as NGS reads of prokaryotes. For complete genomes, RFGR uses a suffix trees to find seed repeats of repetitive sequences of fixed length with indels. For assembled genomes, RFGR uses a modified Bowtie aligner to find seed repeats of exact repetitive sequences in the contigs/ scaffolds, which are then extended to maximal repeats. The repeats are classified and for repeats near a gene, RFGR reports the gene as well. For the control dataset of E. coli UTI89 and E. coli K12, RFGR reports 35,141 and 49,352 repeats, respectively. For NGS reads, RFGR uses the frequency of the repetitive k-mers to determine FASTQ reads containing repetitive sequences and removes them from the dataset. An E. coli K12 NGS dataset pre-processed using RFGR, on comparison with the original dataset, gives an improved assembly. The N50 value improves by 22.86% with a decrease in size of the assembly graph by nearly 50%. Thus, with RFGR, we achieve a better assembly with reduced computation. RFGR can be improved in terms of the length of the minimum repeat found, extending to find approximate repeats and to be applicable to Eukaryotes as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.