ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024
Versatile Use of V-Y Advancement Flap for Facial Defect Reconstruction: A Case Series in Asian Patients.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundV-Y advancement flap (VYAF) is a commonly used flap for facial reconstruction, but it is not popular in Asian society with limited aesthetic outcome evaluation.
objectiveTo demonstrate our experience of facial VYAF with the quantitative aesthetic outcome assessment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From January 2013 to December 2022, patients who underwent facial VYAF reconstruction were reviewed. Postoperative photographs were collected and independently graded by three plastic surgeons, three nurses, and six non-medical personnel using Manchester scar scale (MSS). The representative preoperative images were selected for surgeons' reconstruction preferences survey.
resultsForty-eight patients (27 females and 21 males), with a mean age of 66.8 (23-97) years, were included in this study. All flaps survived with no flap necrosis. Only six patients (12.5%) developed minor postoperative complications, and they were treated conservatively and resolved uneventfully. The total MSS score was 7.8 ± 1.9 (scale of 4 [best scar] to 24 [worst scar]) and the overall scar VAS rating was 1.9 ± 1.1 (0 [best scar] to 10 [worst scar]), indicating satisfactory postoperative scar condition. From the survey of 22 plastic surgeons and 11 scenarios, VYAF was rarely chosen among other local flaps which only accounted for 8.7%.
conclusionVYAF is an easy and safe method for facial reconstruction with low morbidity, but its usefulness is underappreciated. With a proper design and cautious dissection, we believe that good aesthetic and functional outcomes can be achieved with VYAF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.