Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38212490›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2024

Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of sarcoidosis: a population-based nested case-control study in Sweden.

Marina Dehara, Susanna Kullberg, Marie Bixo, Michael C Sachs, Johan Grunewald, Elizabeth V Arkema

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Sex differences in cardiac sarcoidosis.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marina DeharaClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital T2, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden. marina.dehara@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0768-7453
Susanna KullbergRespiratory Medicine Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2844-4773
Marie BixoDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4988-1967
Michael C SachsDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1279-8676
Johan GrunewaldRespiratory Medicine Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0473-3984
Elizabeth V ArkemaClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital T2, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3677-9736
Karolinska University Hospital · SEUmeå University · SEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Hjärt-Lungfonden 2019-0478Hjärt-Lungfonden 2020-0163Hjärt-Lungfonden 2020-0452Vetenskapsrådet 2017-01548Vetenskapsrådet 2019-00227Vetenskapsrådet 2019-01034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sarcoidosis incidence peaks in women between 50 and 60 years old, which coincides with menopause, suggesting that certain sex hormones, mainly estrogen, may play a role in disease development. We investigated whether menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) was associated with sarcoidosis risk in women and whether the risk varied by treatment type. We performed a nested case-control study (2007-2020) including incident sarcoidosis cases from the Swedish National Patient Register (n = 2593) and matched (1:10) to general population controls (n = 20,003) on birth year, county, and living in Sweden at the time of sarcoidosis diagnosis. Dispensations of MHT were obtained from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register before sarcoidosis diagnosis/matching. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of sarcoidosis were estimated using conditional logistic regression. Ever MHT use was associated with a 25% higher risk of sarcoidosis compared with never use (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13-1.38). When MHT type and route of administration were considered together, systemic estrogen was associated with the highest risk of sarcoidosis (aOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.23-1.85), followed by local estrogen (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11-1.42), while systemic estrogen-progestogen combined was associated with the lowest risk compared to never users (aOR 1.12, 95% CI 0.96-1.31). The aOR of sarcoidosis did not differ greatly by duration of MHT use. Our findings suggest that a history of MHT use is associated with increased risk of sarcoidosis, with women receiving estrogen administered systemically having the highest risk.

Indexed as

MenopauseSarcoidosisCase-Control StudiesEstrogen Replacement TherapyEstrogensFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSwedenEstrogensCase–control studiesEstrogenMenopausal hormone therapyRisk factorsSarcoidosisWomen

Identifiers

PMID38212490
PMCPMC10994872
OpenAlexW4390765755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.