Observational studyJournal of anesthesia2024
Amplitude at 10 min in thromboelastography predicts maximum amplitude: a single-center observational study.
Observational study in Journal of anesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in blood concentration of tranexamic acid in dialysis and non-dialysis patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thromboelastography is a quantitative test widely used to measure the efficiency of blood clotting. However, awaiting the results of maximum amplitude (MA) is necessary for determining the need for platelet- and fibrinogen-containing products. A more rapid prediction of MA could facilitate faster preparation and administration of blood transfusion products, thereby resulting in coagulation improvement. In this retrospective study, we hypothesized that early amplitude at 10 min (A10) could be a predictor of MA. Therefore, we investigated whether MA can be rapidly inferred from thromboelastographic 6 s (TEG6s) measurements and evaluated its correlation with A10. We extracted TEG6s measurements obtained in operating rooms and intensive care units of our hospital between January 2018 and December 2022. The correlation of MA with display items of TEG6s results, including reaction time, kinetics, α angle, activated clotting time, and A10, was evaluated. The relationship between citrated rapid TEG (CRT)-A10 and CRT-MA, as well as between citrated functional fibrinogen (CFF)-A10 and CFF-MA, were evaluated if A10 and MA showed a good correlation. The results showed good correlations between CRT-A10 and CRT-MA, as well as between CFF-A10 and CFF-MA. Therefore, evaluating A10 using TEG6s could predict MA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38212407What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.