ReviewDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Global environmental changes and the epithelial barrier hypothesis].
Review in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Mental disorders from climate and environmental changes using the example of dermatology].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe global burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCD) has seen a strong increase in recent decades and attributable to the influence of environmental factors. For a multitude of diseases an association with epithelial barrier damage has been reported.
objectiveThis article provides an overview of the health effects of environmental pollution in the context of the epithelial barrier hypothesis of Cezmi Akdis. Additionally, exemplary mechanisms of a barrier damage are described. Finally, possible preventive and therapeutic consequences are discussed. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe PubMed database was searched for the relevant topics and selected literature was reviewed.
resultsA wide variety of substances can damage the epithelial barriers of the skin, lungs and gastrointestinal tract. The rise in the prevalences of atopic diseases could (partly) be due to an increased exposure to barrier-damaging substances, such as particulate matter and laundry detergents. A possible pathogenetic mechanism is the initiation and maintenance of an immune response by subepithelial penetration of microorganisms through damaged epithelia.
conclusionBased on the epithelial barrier hypothesis new therapeutic and prevention strategies can be developed. The regulation of hazardous chemicals and the fight against environmental pollution and climate change are necessary to reduce the burden of disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.