ArticleChemosphere2024
Pharmaceutical impacts on aerobic granular sludge morphology and potential implications for abiotic removal.
Article in Chemosphere, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Environmentally-grown aerobic granular sludge performs more complete pharmaceutical biodegradation and wastewater treatment than lab-grown granules.International biodeterioration & biodegradation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of this study was to investigate abiotic pharmaceutical removal and abiotic pharmaceutical effects on aerobic granular sludge morphology. For 80 days, a pharmaceutical mixture containing approximately 150 μg/L each of diclofenac, erythromycin, and gemfibrozil was fed to an aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactor and granule characteristics were compared with those from a control reactor. Aqueous and solid phase pharmaceutical concentrations were monitored and staining was used to assess changes in biofilm structures. Solid phase pharmaceutical concentrations were elevated over the first 12 days of dosing; however, they then dropped, indicative of desorption. The lipid content in pharmaceutical-exposed granules declined by approximately half over the dosing period, though the relative concentrations of other key biofilm components (proteins, alpha-, and beta-polysaccharides) did not change. Batch experiments were conducted to try to find an explanation for the desorption observed, but reduced solid phase pharmaceutical concentrations could not be linked with the presence of common wastewater constituents such as ammonia or phosphate. Sorption of all three compounds was modeled best by the Henry isotherm, indicating that, even at 150 μg/L, granules' sorption site coverage was incomplete. Altogether, this study demonstrates that simplified batch systems may not accurately represent the complex abiotic processes occurring in flow-through, biotic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.