Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38211658›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2024

Deep learning based automated left ventricle segmentation and flow quantification in 4D flow cardiac MRI.

Xiaowu Sun, Li-Hsin Cheng, Sven Plein, Pankaj Garg, Rob J van der Geest

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Fully automated on-scanner aortic four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging processing and hemodynamic analysis.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Article
  11. A systematic review of machine learning in heart disease prediction.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2025
    Review
  12. Cardiac function assessment with deep-learning-based automatic segmentation of free-running four-dimensional whole-heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaowu SunDivision of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Li-Hsin ChengDivision of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Sven PleinLeeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Pankaj GargNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom; Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Rob J van der GeestDivision of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands. Electronic address: R.J.van_der_Geest@lumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background4D flow MRI enables assessment of cardiac function and intra-cardiac blood flow dynamics from a single acquisition. However, due to the poor contrast between the chambers and surrounding tissue, quantitative analysis relies on the segmentation derived from a registered cine MRI acquisition. This requires an additional acquisition and is prone to imperfect spatial and temporal inter-scan alignment. Therefore, in this work we developed and evaluated deep learning-based methods to segment the left ventricle (LV) from 4D flow MRI directly.

methodsWe compared five deep learning-based approaches with different network structures, data pre-processing and feature fusion methods. For the data pre-processing, the 4D flow MRI data was reformatted into a stack of short-axis view slices. Two feature fusion approaches were proposed to integrate the features from magnitude and velocity images. The networks were trained and evaluated on an in-house dataset of 101 subjects with 67,567 2D images and 3030 3D volumes. The performance was evaluated using various metrics including Dice, average surface distance (ASD), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV blood flow kinetic energy (KE) and LV flow components. The Monte Carlo dropout method was used to assess the confidence and to describe the uncertainty area in the segmentation results.

resultsAmong the five models, the model combining 2D U-Net with late fusion method operating on short-axis reformatted 4D flow volumes achieved the best results with Dice of 84.52% and ASD of 3.14 mm. The best averaged absolute and relative error between manual and automated segmentation for EDV, ESV, LVEF and KE was 19.93 ml (10.39%), 17.38 ml (22.22%), 7.37% (13.93%) and 0.07 mJ (5.61%), respectively. Flow component results derived from automated segmentation showed high correlation and small average error compared to results derived from manual segmentation.

conclusionsDeep learning-based methods can achieve accurate automated LV segmentation and subsequent quantification of volumetric and hemodynamic LV parameters from 4D flow MRI without requiring an additional cine MRI acquisition.

Indexed as

AutomationCoronary CirculationDeep LearningHeart VentriclesImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPredictive Value of TestsVentricular Function, LeftBlood Flow VelocityDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Results4D flow MRIDeep learningLeft ventricle segmentation

Identifiers

PMID38211658
PMCPMC11211221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.