Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38206971›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2024

Searching across-cohort relatives in 54,092 GWAS samples via encrypted genotype regression.

Qi-Xin Zhang, Tianzi Liu, Xinxin Guo, Jianxin Zhen, Meng-Yuan Yang, Saber Khederzadeh, Fang Zhou, Xiaotong Han, Qiwen Zheng, Peilin Jia and 15 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Identification ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Building and sharing medical cohorts for research.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Qi-Xin ZhangInstitute of Bioinformatics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Tianzi LiuCAS Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Xinxin GuoSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Jianxin ZhenCentral Laboratory, Shenzhen Baoan Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Meng-Yuan YangDiseases & Population (DaP) Geninfo Lab, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Saber KhederzadehDiseases & Population (DaP) Geninfo Lab, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Fang ZhouState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaotong HanState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Qiwen ZhengCAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Peilin JiaCAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaohu DingState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Mingguang HeState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xin ZouState Key Laboratory of CAD & GC, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jia-Kai LiaoSchool of Mathematics and Statistics and Research Institute of Mathematical Sciences (RIMS), Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Educational Big Data Science and Engineering, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Hongxin ZhangState Key Laboratory of CAD & GC, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ji HeDepartment of Neurology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaofeng ZhuDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
Daru LuState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and MOE Engineering Research Center of Gene Technology, School of Life Sciences and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hongyan ChenState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Changqing ZengCAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Fan LiuCAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hou-Feng ZhengDiseases & Population (DaP) Geninfo Lab, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Siyang LiuSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Hai-Ming XuInstitute of Bioinformatics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Guo-Bo ChenCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Genetic and Genomic Medicine, and Clinical Research Institute, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5475-8237

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Explicitly sharing individual level data in genomics studies has many merits comparing to sharing summary statistics, including more strict QCs, common statistical analyses, relative identification and improved statistical power in GWAS, but it is hampered by privacy or ethical constraints. In this study, we developed encG-reg, a regression approach that can detect relatives of various degrees based on encrypted genomic data, which is immune of ethical constraints. The encryption properties of encG-reg are based on the random matrix theory by masking the original genotypic matrix without sacrificing precision of individual-level genotype data. We established a connection between the dimension of a random matrix, which masked genotype matrices, and the required precision of a study for encrypted genotype data. encG-reg has false positive and false negative rates equivalent to sharing original individual level data, and is computationally efficient when searching relatives. We split the UK Biobank into their respective centers, and then encrypted the genotype data. We observed that the relatives estimated using encG-reg was equivalently accurate with the estimation by KING, which is a widely used software but requires original genotype data. In a more complex application, we launched a finely devised multi-center collaboration across 5 research institutes in China, covering 9 cohorts of 54,092 GWAS samples. encG-reg again identified true relatives existing across the cohorts with even different ethnic backgrounds and genotypic qualities. Our study clearly demonstrates that encrypted genomic data can be used for data sharing without loss of information or data sharing barrier.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPrivacyGenomicsGenotypeHumansSoftware

Identifiers

PMID38206971
PMCPMC10783776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.