ArticlePloS one2024
AutoPhy: Automated phylogenetic identification of novel protein subfamilies.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discovering New Orthologous Groups with P-COGs.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- ASMC: investigating the amino acid diversity of enzyme active sites.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phylogenetic analysis of protein sequences provides a powerful means of identifying novel protein functions and subfamilies, and for identifying and resolving annotation errors. However, automation of functional clustering based on phylogenetic trees has been challenging and most of it is done manually. Clustering phylogenetic trees usually requires the delineation of tree-based thresholds (e.g., distances), leading to an ad hoc problem. We propose a new phylogenetic clustering approach that identifies clusters without using ad hoc distances or other pre-defined values. Our workflow combines uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) with Gaussian mixture models as a k-means like procedure to automatically group sequences into clusters. We then apply a "second pass" clade identification algorithm to resolve non-monophyletic groups. We tested our approach with several well-curated protein families (outer membrane porins, acyltransferase, and nuclear receptors) and showed our automated methods recapitulated known subfamilies. We also applied our methods to a broad range of different protein families from multiple databases, including Pfam, PANTHER, and UniProt, and to alignments of RNA viral genomes. Our results showed that AutoPhy rapidly generated monophyletic clusters (subfamilies) within phylogenetic trees evolving at very different rates both within and among phylogenies. The phylogenetic clusters generated by AutoPhy resolved misannotations and identified new protein functional groups and novel viral strains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.