Observational studyPloS one2024
Antimicrobial resistance patterns of WHO priority pathogens isolated in hospitalized patients in Japan: A tertiary center observational study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comorbidities and mortality in colistin-resistant gram-negative infections among hospitalized patients in Qassim, Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026Article
- Therapeutic advances in the fight against microbial resistance: innovative strategies and future challenges.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Genomic characterization of plasmids harboringMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Structural Characterisation of TetR/AcrR Regulators inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAfter issuing the "Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance" in 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO) established a priority pathogens list for supporting research and development of novel antimicrobials. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of the WHO priority organisms in a Japanese tertiary hospital to apprehend the local AMR epidemiology.
methodsData were obtained from electrical medical records in Osaka University Hospital between January 2010 and March 2021. The critical, high, and medium "priority pathogens list" categories of the WHO were used to compare results between the early (2010-2015) and late (2016-2021) phases.
resultsOut of 52,130 culture-positive specimens, a total of 9,872 (18.9%) contained WHO priority isolates. In comparison to early phases, late phases were likely to have higher rates of carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15.7% vs 25.0%, P<0.001), 3rd generation cephalosporin resistance in Escherichia coli (11.5% vs 17.8%, P<0.001) as well as Klebsiella pneumoniae (1.6% vs 4.4%, P<0.001), and ampicillin resistance in Haemophilus influenzae (2.4% vs 3.9%, P<0.001). After 2015, however, the proportion of methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus was low. In this study, in-hospital mortality was comparable among patients with resistance to the three WHO priority pathogen types: critical (5.9%), high (3.9%), and medium (3.8%), and no significant change was observed between two phases in each category. However, significant interactions for in-hospital mortality were observed in subgroup analyses between "critical priority" AMR and the presence of comorbid conditions, such as chronic kidney disease or diabetes mellitus.
conclusionsTo implement better antimicrobial stewardship policies and practices, local priority pathogens and "high-risk" patients for in-hospital death need to be acknowledged and evaluated periodically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.