ArticlePloS one2024
Shear wave elastography: A noninvasive approach for assessing acute kidney injury in critically ill patients.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Closing the Loop: High-Precision 3D Photofabrication in Living Tissues.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Renal elastography in kidney disease: Current evidence, limitations, and future directions.World journal of nephrology · 2026Review
- The expanding role of ultrasound in acute kidney injury: from B-mode to microcirculation.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Renal Shear Wave Elastography for Differentiating Vasculitic and Non-Vasculitic Acute Kidney Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Shear wave elastography as a reliable tool in the prediction of renal histopathological abnormalities.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Renal resistive index and shear wave elastography in assessment of kidney function after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a pilot prospective observational study.Polish journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Beyond biochemistry: multiparametric ultrasound parameters and their molecular correlates in cardio-renal-metabolic syndrome.Acta biochimica Polonica · 2026Review
- Application of ultrasonography elastography in chronic transplanted kidney renal insufficiency: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Review
- Deep learning in renal ultrasound: applications, challenges, and future outlook.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- New approaches to acute kidney injury.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional markers, such as serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, frequently show delayed elevations following acute kidney injury (AKI), limiting their utility for prompt detection and timely intervention in AKI management. Shear wave elastography (SWE) exhibits potential for AKI diagnosis by measuring tissue stiffness. Our study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of SWE in detecting AKI by measuring the stiffness of kidney tissue. Between July 2022 and December 2022, a total of 103 consecutive participants who met the eligibility criteria were prospectively enrolled, underwent SWE measurements, and were classified into AKI or non-AKI groups based on the 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to examine the feasibility of differentiating between AKI and non-AKI patients and assessing diagnostic performance. The effects of tissue anisotropy on SWE measurements were also examined. Our results revealed that patients in the AKI group exhibited significantly increased stiffness values in specific kidney regions compared with those in the non-AKI group. For the diagnosis of AKI, the optimal cut-off values were identified as 9.9 kPa, 2.9 kPa, and 4.4 kPa for the upper pole medulla, middle cortex, and middle medulla, respectively, in the longitudinal plane. Correspondingly, the areas under the ROC curves for these regions were 0.737 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.637, 0.822), 0.736 (95% CI: 0.637, 0.821), and 0.784 (95% CI: 0.688, 0.861). Additionally, we observed a significant variability in stiffness values due to tissue anisotropy, specifically in the segments of the upper pole cortex, and medulla across both longitudinal and transverse planes. SWE serves as a noninvasive approach for the quantification of tissue stiffness and shows promise as an adjunctive tool for the assessment of AKI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.