Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38206631›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2024

Mirtazapine as Appetite Stimulant in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Anorexia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Oscar Arrieta, Daniela Cárdenas-Fernández, Oscar Rodriguez-Mayoral, Salvador Gutierrez-Torres, Diana Castañares, Diana Flores-Estrada, Edgar Reyes, Dennis López, Pablo Barragán, Pamela Soberanis Pina and 2 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04748523 (Effect of Mirtazapine Versus Placebo on Appetite, Nutritional Status and Quality of Life in Non-small Cell Lung cáncer Patients With Anorexia; Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04748523 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Mirtazapine Versus Placebo on Appetite, Nutritional Status and Quality of Life in Non-small Cell Lung cáncer Patients With Anorexia; Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Nacional de Cancerologia de MexicoRan2018 to 2022Enrolled86ConditionsAnorexia, Non-small Cell Lung CancerArmsMirtazapine, Placebo Oral Tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Appetite loss during chemotherapy is associated with reduced dietary intake and quality of life in patients with gynecologic cancer: a prospective observational study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  3. Practical prescribing in cancer cachexia.Current opinion in supportive and palliative care · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Cancer cachexia: molecular basis and therapeutic advances.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Body composition alterations in patients with lung cancer.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2025
    Review
  13. The role of enteral nutrition in cancer patients - methodological adjustments and recommendations.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. [Improving the nutritional situation of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through off-label medication].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Mirtazapine Therapy for a Patient With Weight Loss and Gastroparesis Associated With Limited Systemic Sclerosis.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Oscar ArrietaThoracic Oncology Unit, National Cancer Institute of Mexico, Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico.
Daniela Cárdenas-FernándezNutrition department of Thoracic Oncology Unit, National Cancer Institute of Mexico, Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico.
Oscar Rodriguez-MayoralPalliative Care department, National Cancer Institute of Mexico, Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico.
Salvador Gutierrez-TorresRadiotherapy department, National Cancer Institute of Mexico, Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico.
Diana CastañaresThoracic Oncology Unit, National Cancer Institute of Mexico, Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico.
Diana Flores-EstradaThoracic Oncology Unit, National Cancer Institute of Mexico, Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico.
Edgar ReyesThoracic Oncology Unit, National Cancer Institute of Mexico, Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico.
Dennis LópezThoracic Oncology Unit, National Cancer Institute of Mexico, Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico.
Pablo BarragánThoracic Oncology Unit, National Cancer Institute of Mexico, Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico.
Pamela Soberanis PinaThoracic Oncology Unit, National Cancer Institute of Mexico, Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico.
Andres F CardonaTreatment and research Center, C.T.I.C, Bogotá, Colombia.
Jenny G TurcottNutrition department of Thoracic Oncology Unit, National Cancer Institute of Mexico, Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico.
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXThe Nature Conservancy · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Currently there is no standard therapy to improve cancer-related anorexia, hampering survival. Mirtazapine has been suggested as a feasible option in this context. Objectives: To assess the effect of mirtazapine on appetite and energy consumption in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial including adults was performed in a tertiary cancer care center from August 2018 to May 2022 with a follow-up of 8 weeks. Overall, 134 patients were screened; 114 were assessed for eligibility and 28 were excluded. Interventions: Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive mirtazapine, 15 mg, or placebo for 2 weeks followed by a dose escalation to 30 mg until week 8 or placebo. Both groups received nutritional assessment and dietary advice. Main outcomes and measures: Appetite was assessed by the Anorexia Cachexia Scale and energy intake. Dietary parameters were evaluated at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks, with a 24-hour dietary recall, and energy quantification based on the Mexican system of nutritional equivalents. Results: A total of 86 patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomized to the placebo (n = 43) or the mirtazapine group (n = 43). The mean (SD) age was 63.5 (11.2) years, 41 were women (57.7%) and had adenocarcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scale score of 1, stage IV NSCLC, and were receiving first-line treatment. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There was no difference in appetite scores in patients who received mirtazapine or placebo after 4 and 8 weeks. After 4 weeks, mirtazapine significantly increased energy intake (379.3 kcal; 95% CI, 1382.6-576.1; P < .001) including proteins (22.5 g; 95% CI, 11.5-33.4; P = .001), carbohydrates (43.4 g; 95% CI, 13.1-73.8; P = .006), and fats (13.2 g; 95% CI, 6.0-20.4; P = .006). Fats intake was significantly higher in patients in the mirtazapine group (14.5 g vs 0.7 g; P = .02) after 8 weeks. The mirtazapine group significantly decreased the proportion of patients with sarcopenia (82.8% vs 57.1%, P = .03) at 8 weeks. Patients on mirtazapine tolerated the treatment well, but reported a higher perception of nightmares at 2 weeks based on a 10 cm VAS score (0 [25th-75th percentile, 0-1] vs 0 [25th-75th percentile, 0-0] in the control group; P = .009) but this finding was nonsignificant after 4 and 8 weeks. Conclusion and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of patients with advanced NSCLC, there was no difference in appetite scores in all patients who received mirtazapine or placebo, but the mirtazapine group had a significant increase in energy intake through the 4- and 8-week follow-up, mainly in fat intake, which is a better and crucial source of energy. The addition of mirtazapine in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and anorexia may help these patients achieve their energy requirements and improve health-related quality of life, specifically emotional and cognitive functioning. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04748523.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAdultAgedAnorexiaAppetite StimulantsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMirtazapineQuality of LifeAppetite StimulantsMirtazapine

Identifiers

PMID38206631
PMCPMC10784994
OpenAlexW4390739302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.