Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38206628›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Posterolateral or Direct Lateral Surgical Approach for Hemiarthroplasty After a Hip Fracture: A Randomized Clinical Trial Alongside a Natural Experiment.

Maria C J M Tol, Nienke W Willigenburg, Ariena J Rasker, Hanna C Willems, Taco Gosens, Martin J Heetveld, Martijn G M Schotanus, Bart Eggen, Mate Kormos, Stéphanie L van der Pas and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04438226 (Surgical Approach of Hemiarthroplasty After Femoral Neck Fracture), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04438226 nacompletednot on this map

Surgical Approach of Hemiarthroplasty After Femoral Neck Fracture: Posterolateral or Direct Lateral

TypeinterventionalSponsorJointResearchRan2017 to 2022Enrolled555ConditionsHip Fractures, Surgical Approach, Hemiarthroplasty, PosterolateralArmsSurgical approach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Maria C J M TolDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nienke W WilligenburgDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ariena J RaskerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Hanna C WillemsDepartment of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Taco GosensDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, ETZ, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Martin J HeetveldDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands.
Martijn G M SchotanusDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery & Traumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands.
Bart EggenDelft University of Technology, Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft, the Netherlands.
Mate KormosDelft University of Technology, Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft, the Netherlands.
Stéphanie L van der PasAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Aad W van der VaartDelft University of Technology, Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft, the Netherlands.
J Carel GoslingsDepartment of Trauma Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rudolf W PoolmanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
APOLLO Research Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Hip fractures in older adults are serious injuries that result in disability, higher rates of illness and death, and a substantial strain on health care resources. High-quality evidence to improve hip fracture care regarding the surgical approach of hemiarthroplasty is lacking. Objective: To compare 6-month outcomes of the posterolateral approach (PLA) and direct lateral approach (DLA) for hemiarthroplasty in patients with acute femoral neck fracture. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing DLA and PLA was performed alongside a natural experiment (NE) at 14 centers in the Netherlands. Patients aged 18 years or older with an acute femoral neck fracture were included, with or without dementia. Secondary surgery of the hip, pathological fractures, or patients with multitrauma were excluded. Recruitment took place between February 2018 and January 2022. Treatment allocation was random or pseudorandom based on geographical location and surgeon preference. Statistical analysis was performed from July 2022 to September 2022. Exposure: Hemiarthroplasty using PLA or DLA. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was health-related quality of life 6 months after surgery, quantified with the EuroQol Group 5-Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Secondary outcomes included dislocations, fear of falling and falls, activities of daily living, pain, and reoperations. To improve generalizability, a novel technique was used for data fusion of the RCT and NE. Results: A total of 843 patients (542 [64.3%] female; mean [SD] age, 82.2 [7.5] years) participated, with 555 patients in the RCT (283 patients in the DLA group; 272 patients in the PLA group) and 288 patients in the NE (172 patients in the DLA group; 116 patients in the PLA group). In the RCT, mean EQ-5D-5L utility scores at 6 months were 0.50 (95% CI, 0.45-0.55) after DLA and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.44-0.54) after PLA, with 77% completeness. The between-group difference (-0.04 [95% CI, -0.11 to 0.04]) was not statistically significant nor clinically meaningful. Most secondary outcomes were comparable between groups, but PLA was associated with more dislocations than DLA (RCT: 15 of 272 patients [5.5%] in PLA vs 1 of 283 patients [0.4%] in DLA; NE: 6 of 113 patients [5.3%]) in PLA vs 2 of 175 patients [1.1%] in DLA). Data fusion resulted in an effect size of 0.00 (95% CI, -0.04 to 0.05) for the EQ-5D-5L and an odds ratio of 12.31 (95% CI, 2.77 to 54.70) for experiencing a dislocation after PLA. Conclusions and Relevance: This combined RCT and NE found that among patients treated with a cemented hemiarthroplasty after an acute femoral neck fracture, PLA was not associated with a better quality of life than DLA. Rates of dislocation and reoperation were higher after PLA. Randomized and pseudorandomized data yielded similar outcomes, which suggests a strengthening of these findings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04438226.

Indexed as

Femoral Neck FracturesFractures, SpontaneousHemiarthroplastyHip FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID38206628
PMCPMC10784859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.