Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38206589›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2024

A graph clustering algorithm for detection and genotyping of structural variants from long reads.

Nicolás Gaitán, Jorge Duitama

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicolás GaitánSystems and Computing Engineering Department, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia.ORCID 0009-0009-2979-2703
Jorge DuitamaSystems and Computing Engineering Department, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-9105-6266

Funding

Francisco José de Caldas 80740-441-2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStructural variants (SVs) are genomic polymorphisms defined by their length (>50 bp). The usual types of SVs are deletions, insertions, translocations, inversions, and copy number variants. SV detection and genotyping is fundamental given the role of SVs in phenomena such as phenotypic variation and evolutionary events. Thus, methods to identify SVs using long-read sequencing data have been recently developed.

findingsWe present an accurate and efficient algorithm to predict germline SVs from long-read sequencing data. The algorithm starts collecting evidence (signatures) of SVs from read alignments. Then, signatures are clustered based on a Euclidean graph with coordinates calculated from lengths and genomic positions. Clustering is performed by the DBSCAN algorithm, which provides the advantage of delimiting clusters with high resolution. Clusters are transformed into SVs and a Bayesian model allows to precisely genotype SVs based on their supporting evidence. This algorithm is integrated into the single sample variants detector of the Next Generation Sequencing Experience Platform, which facilitates the integration with other functionalities for genomics analysis. We performed multiple benchmark experiments, including simulation and real data, representing different genome profiles, sequencing technologies (PacBio HiFi, ONT), and read depths.

conclusionThe results show that our approach outperformed state-of-the-art tools on germline SV calling and genotyping, especially at low depths, and in error-prone repetitive regions. We believe this work significantly contributes to the development of bioinformatic strategies to maximize the use of long-read sequencing technologies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBayes TheoremCluster AnalysisGenotypebioinformaticsgenomicsgenotypinggraph algorithmsstructural variants

Identifiers

PMID38206589
PMCPMC10783151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.