Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38206533›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2024

Treatment patterns of patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor-based regimens: a cohort study in the French nationwide healthcare database.

Stephanie H Read, Nadia Quignot, Raissa Kapso-Kapnang, Erin Comerford, Ying Zheng, Corona Gainford, Medha Sasane, Anne-Lise Vataire, Laure Delzongle, Francois-Clement Bidard

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Exploring the real-world experience of abemaciclib treatment for HR +, HER2 - metastatic breast cancer-a qualitative analysis of the IMPACTOR study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie H ReadCertara UK Limited, London, UK. Stephanie.Read@certara.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2087-7358
Nadia QuignotCertara France, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8718-1307
Raissa Kapso-KapnangCertara France, Paris, France.
Erin ComerfordSanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ying ZhengSanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Corona GainfordSanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Medha SasaneSanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Anne-Lise VataireSanofi, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3354-3189
Laure DelzongleSanofi, Paris, France.
Francois-Clement BidardDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5932-8949
Sanofi (United States) · USSanofi (France) · FRCertara (United States) · USUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess real-world treatment patterns in patients diagnosed with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who received cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant at first line.

methodsPatient characteristics, treatment history, and outcomes data were extracted from the French 'Système National des Données de Santé' (SNDS) database for patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- mBC between January 2014 and June 2019 and who received combination therapy with a CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to assess time to next treatment (TTNT) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTTD).

resultsThe cohort comprised 6061 patients including 4032 patients who received CDK4/6 inhibitors + AIs and 2029 patients who received CDK4/6 inhibitors + fulvestrant. Median follow-up was 13.5 months (IQR 9.5-18.1). The median TTTD of first line treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors + AIs and CDK4/6 inhibitors + fulvestrant was 17.3 months (95% CI 16.8-17.9) and 9.7 months (95% CI 9.0-10.2), respectively. Chemotherapy was the most common second line therapy. Median TTTD of subsequent treatment lines was progressively shorter following first line treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors + AIs (2nd line: 4.6 months (95% CI 4.4-4.9) and with CDK4/6 inhibitors + fulvestrant (2nd line: 4.7 months (95% CI 4.3-5.1). TTNT was longer than TTTD across lines of therapy.

conclusionThis real-world analysis confirms the effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitor-based regimens in French patients and highlights the frequent use of chemotherapy as second line therapy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCohort StudiesCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Delivery of Health CareErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFulvestrantHumansCDK4 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFulvestrantCyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitorEndocrine therapyHormone receptor negativeMetastatic breast cancerReal-world evidenceSNDS

Identifiers

PMID38206533
PMCPMC10959771
OpenAlexW4390743102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.