Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38206522›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024

Ensuring communication redundancy and establishing a telementoring system for robotic telesurgery using multiple communication lines.

Yusuke Wakasa, Kenichi Hakamada, Hajime Morohashi, Takahiro Kanno, Kotaro Tadano, Kenji Kawashima, Yuma Ebihara, Eiji Oki, Satoshi Hirano, Masaki Mori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yusuke WakasaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-Cho Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan.
Kenichi HakamadaCommittee for Promotion of Remote Surgery Implementation, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan. hakamada@hirosaki-u.ac.jp.
Hajime MorohashiCommittee for Promotion of Remote Surgery Implementation, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro KannoRIVERFIELD Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Kotaro TadanoRIVERFIELD Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji KawashimaDepartment of Information Physics and Computing School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuma EbiharaCommittee for Promotion of Remote Surgery Implementation, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Eiji OkiCommittee for Promotion of Remote Surgery Implementation, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi HiranoCommittee for Promotion of Remote Surgery Implementation, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaki MoriCommittee for Promotion of Remote Surgery Implementation, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assuring communication redundancy during the interruption and establishing appropriate teaching environments for local surgeons are essential to making robotic telesurgery mainstream. This study analyzes robotic telesurgery with telementoring using standard domestic telecommunication carriers. Can multiple carriers guarantee redundancy with interruptions? Three commercial optical fiber lines connected Hirosaki University and Mutsu General Hospitals, 150 km apart. Using Riverfield, Inc. equipment, Hirosaki had a cockpit, while both Mutsu used both a cockpit and a surgeon's console. Experts provided telementoring evaluating 14 trainees, using objective indices for operation time and errors. Subjective questionnaires addressed image quality and surgical operability. Eighteen participants performed telesurgery using combined lines from two/three telecommunication carriers. Manipulation: over 30 min, lines were cut and restored every three minutes per task. Subjects were to press a switch when noticing image quality or operability changes. Mean time to task completion was 1510 (1186-1960) seconds: local surgeons alone and 1600 (1152-2296) seconds for those under remote instructor supervision, including expert intervention time. There was no significant difference (p = 0.86). The mean error count was 0.92 (0-3) for local surgeons and 0.42 (0-2) with remote instructors. Image quality and operability questionnaires found no significant differences. Results communication companies A, B, and C: the A/B combination incurred 0.17 (0-1) presses of the environment change switch, B/C had 0, and C/A received 0.67 (0-3), showing no significant difference among provider combinations. Combining multiple communication lines guarantees communication redundancy and enables robotic telementoring with enhanced communication security.

Indexed as

RoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgeonsCommunicationHumansOperative TimeMultiple communication linesRobotic telesurgeryTelementoring system

Identifiers

PMID38206522
PMCPMC10784335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.