Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38206495›Full record

ArticleJournal of plant research2024

Dominance of non-wetland-dependent pollinators in a plant community in a small natural wetland in Shimane, Japan.

Tomohiro Watazu, Masayoshi K Hiraiwa, Masahito Inoue, Hideo Mishima, Atushi Ushimaru, Tetsuro Hosaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of plant research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tomohiro WatazuDevelopment Technology Course, Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation, Hiroshima University, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima City, Hiroshima, 739-8529, Japan.
Masayoshi K HiraiwaDepartment of Environmental Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Kindai University, 3327-204 Nakamachi, Nara, 631-8505, Japan.
Masahito InoueThe Shimane Nature Museum of Mt. Sanbe, 1121-8 Tane, Sanbe-cho, Ohda, Shimane, 694-0003, Japan.
Hideo MishimaThe Shimane Nature Museum of Mt. Sanbe, 1121-8 Tane, Sanbe-cho, Ohda, Shimane, 694-0003, Japan.
Atushi UshimaruGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, 3-11 Tsurukabuto, Nada, Kobe, 657- 8501, Japan.
Tetsuro HosakaTransdisciplinary Science and Engineering Program, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, 7398529, Japan. hosaka3@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4474-4621

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many wetland plants rely on insects for pollination. However, studies examining pollinator communities in wetlands remain limited. Some studies conducted in large wetlands (> 10 ha) have suggested that wetland-dependent flies, which spend their larval stage in aquatic and semi-aquatic habitats, dominate as pollinators. However, smaller wetlands surrounded by secondary forests are more prevalent in Japan, in which pollinators from the surrounding environment might be important. Additionally, information regarding floral traits that attract specific pollinator groups in wetland communities is scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to understand the characteristics of insect pollinators in a small natural wetland (2.5 ha) in Japan. We examined the major pollinator groups visiting 34 plant species and explored the relationship between the flower visitation frequency of each pollinator group and floral traits. Overall, flies were the most dominant pollinators (42%), followed by bees and wasps (33%). Cluster analysis indicated that fly-dominated plants were the most abundant among 14 of the 34 target plant species. However, 85% of the hoverflies, the most abundant flies, and 82% of the bees were non-wetland-dependent species, suggesting that these terrestrial species likely originated from the surrounding environment. Therefore, pollinators from the surrounding environment would be important in small natural wetlands. Flies tend to visit open and white/yellow flowers, whereas bees tended to visit tube-shaped flowers, as in forest and grassland ecosystems. The dominance of flies in small wetlands would be due to the dominance of flowers preferred by flies (e.g., yellow/white flowers) rather than because of their larval habitats.

Indexed as

DipteraEcosystemAnimalsBeesFlowersJapanLarvaPlantsPollinationWetlandsBumblebeeDipteraHover flyMuscoid flyPollination syndromePollinator community

Identifiers

PMID38206495
PMCPMC10899375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.