Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38206402›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Olfactory cleft stenosis and obstruction on paranasal sinus CT scan in pre-septo-rhinoplasty patients: normal variants or pathologic findings?

Sara Imbs, Baptiste Deyrail, Duc Trung Nguyen, Gabriela Hossu, Alain Blum, Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira, Cécile Rumeau, Roger Jankowski, Romain Gillet

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sara ImbsGuilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 29 avenue du Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny, Nancy, 54000, France.
Baptiste DeyrailENT and Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital Center of Nancy, Nancy, France.
Duc Trung NguyenENT and Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital Center of Nancy, Nancy, France.
Gabriela HossuUniversité de Lorraine, INSERM, IADI, Nancy, France.
Alain BlumGuilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 29 avenue du Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny, Nancy, 54000, France.
Pedro Augusto Gondim TeixeiraGuilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 29 avenue du Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny, Nancy, 54000, France.
Cécile RumeauENT and Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital Center of Nancy, Nancy, France.
Roger JankowskiENT and Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital Center of Nancy, Nancy, France.
Romain GilletGuilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, 29 avenue du Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny, Nancy, 54000, France. r.gillet@chru-nancy.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1350-1694

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE(S): To determine the frequency of olfactory cleft (OC) stenosis and obstruction on paranasal sinus CT scans in pre-septorhinoplasty of patients who had septal deviation, septopyramidal deformation or nasal obstruction without other sinonasal conditions.

methodsThis retrospective study included patients referred to our institution between December 2013 and December 2021 for septorhinoplasty due to nasal obstruction without other sinonasal or neurological conditions. All patients underwent preoperative paranasal sinus CT scan and olfactory testing. OC stenosis was quoted as none, partial, or total (less than 1/3 contact between nasal septum and ethmoid turbinates, 1/3-2/3, more than 2/3, respectively), as well as OC obstruction as none, partial, or complete (obstruction of less than 1/3 of OC, 1/3-2/3, more than 2/3, respectively). Radiologic evaluation was validated by near perfect interobserver agreement.

resultsA total of 75 patients (32 women, 43 men) with a mean age of 44.2 ± 15.64 (23-74) years were included, of which 36 were normosmic and 39 hyposmic. OC stenosis was partial in 58.7% (n = 44) of the patients, absent in 28% (n = 21), and total in 13.3% (n = 10), without difference between normosmic and hyposmic patients (p = .66). OC obstruction was absent in 52% (n = 39) and partial in 46.7% (n = 35), without difference between normosmic and hyposmic patients (p = .51). Only one normosmic patient had complete OC obstruction.

conclusionOC partial stenosis and partial obstruction were frequent findings in pre-septorhinoplasty patients without respiratory mucosa disease and did not influence their olfactory status. Total stenosis and complete obstruction were rarer and require further investigation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Isolated partial olfactory cleft stenosis and obstruction should be considered normal variants, whereas the impact of complete olfactory cleft stenosis and obstruction on patient's olfactory status remains to be determined. KEY POINTS: • The incidence of olfactory cleft stenosis and obstruction in asymptomatic patients remains unknown, even though it is encountered in clinical practice. • Partial and total olfactory cleft stenosis occurred in 58.7% and 13.3% of the patients; partial obstruction occurred in half of the cases, but complete obstruction was extremely rare. • There are frequent findings of partial olfactory cleft obstruction and stenosis, but complete obstruction and total stenosis should be further investigated.

Indexed as

Nasal ObstructionRhinoplastyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedConstriction, PathologicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasal SeptumParanasal SinusesRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultComputed tomographyOlfactory cleftOlfactory testingSeptoplastyStenosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.