Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38206399›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Factors predicting indistinct plane of surgical capsule in patients underwent HoLEP procedures.

Ke Liu, Xun Zhao, Ruotao Xiao, Lei Zhao, Chunlei Xiao, Shudong Zhang, Lulin Ma

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ke Liu *Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6608-580X
Xun Zhao *Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Ruotao XiaoDepartment of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Lei ZhaoDepartment of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Chunlei XiaoDepartment of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China. xiaochunleixcl@sina.cn.
Shudong ZhangDepartment of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Lulin MaDepartment of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Peking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate factors that effectively predict indistinct plane (IP) in patients who underwent holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

methodsData of 208 consecutive patients from our HoLEP database were reviewed and analyzed. IP was defined in 107 cases, as the plane could be identified only depending on endoscopic beak dissection rather than laser dissection in the initial stage of HoLEP, whereas the control group consisted of 101 cases. Variables including age, body mass index, prostatic volume (PV), intravesical prostatic protrusion, prostate-specific antigen, prostate-specific antigen density, bladder stones, urinary tract infection, microscopic hematuria, prior biopsy (PB), diabetes, hypertension, history of acute urinary retention, 5-alpha reductase inhibitor treatment, catheter dependency, residual urine, region, smoking, and alcohol consumption were compared between the two groups. The risk factors for predicting the presence of IP were determined using a multivariable binary logistic regression model using a forward selection approach with a focus on improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsThe incidence of IP was 51.4% (107/208). PV (OR = 0.977, p < 0.001) and PB (OR = 0.297, p = 0.028) were identified as the independent predictors of capsule plane status. PV with a cutoff of 54 ml had the best predictive effectiveness for IP based on AUC (0.727; 95% CI 0.659-0.795). The specificity and sensitivity of this cutoff were 82.2% and 53.3%, respectively.

conclusionPV is the most reliable factor to predict IP during HoLEP procedures. There is a high possibility of IP in patients with a PV less than 54 ml.

Indexed as

Laser TherapyProstate-Specific AntigenAnimalsBiopsyDissectionHolmiumHumansMaleUrologic Surgical ProceduresHolmiumProstate-Specific AntigenBenign prostatic hyperplasiaEnucleationLaserProstatic volumeSurgical capsule

Identifiers

PMID38206399
OpenAlexW4390793503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.