Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38206367›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee joint : What does the orthopedic surgeon expect from the radiologist?]

Roland Becker, Wolfgang Nebelung

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roland BeckerZentrum für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg an der Havel, Hochstr. 29, 14770, Brandenburg, Deutschland. r.becker@uk-brandenburg.de.
Wolfgang NebelungOrthopädisch Unfallchirurgische Praxisklinik Neuss-Düsseldorf, Plange Mühle 4, 40221, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnet resonance imaging (MRI) offers a precise visualization of structural changes with high sensitivity and specificity. However, not all these soft tissue damages or bony lesions are clinically relevant or require treatment. Therefore, it is important to provide the radiologist with a specific clinical request when asking for an MRI examination of the knee. In this article, all important anatomical structures of the knee joint will be addressed with emphasis on the relevant questions for the radiologist. Based on the clinical examination, the MRI provides information about the damage of anatomical structures. This information is of utmost importance for therapeutic decision-making in order to allow an adequate and personalized treatment of patients.

Indexed as

Orthopedic SurgeonsHumansKneeKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiologistsBoneCapsuleCartilageLigamentsSoft tissue

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.