Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38206356›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2024

Value of MR arthrography for evaluation of children and adolescents with clinically suspected intraarticular cause of hip pain.

Laura Schmitt, Christian W A Pfirrmann, Florian M Buck, Thomas F Hany, Andrea B Rosskopf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Imaging in hip disorders in childhood and adolescence].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura SchmittFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian W A PfirrmannFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Florian M BuckFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Thomas F HanyFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andrea B RosskopfFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. arosskopf@mri-roentgen.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5322-4759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the distribution of intra- and extraarticular MRI findings in children and adolescents with clinically suspected intraarticular cause of hip pain in order to assess the need for additional intraarticular contrast administration. MATERIAL AND

methodsDatabase was searched over a period of 34 months retrospectively for consecutive hip MR arthrography in young patients (8-17 years) with suspected intraarticular cause of hip or groin pain. Exclusion criteria were prior hip surgery, follow-up examination due to known intraarticular pathology, incomplete examination, qualitatively non-diagnostic examinations, and missing informed consent. Reports of fellowship-trained MSK radiologists were searched for intraarticular versus extraarticular findings explaining hip or groin pain.

resultsSeventy patients (68% female; median age: 14.5 years; range:10.8-16.9 years) were analyzed. No reason for pain was found in 30 (42.9%) hips, extraarticular reasons in 20 (28.6%) cases, intraarticular in 14 (20.0%), and both (intra- and extraarticular) in 6 (8.6%) hips. Most common extraarticular reasons were apophysitis (14.3%), other bony stress reactions (12.9%), intramuscular edema (7%), tendinitis (5.7%), and trochanteric bursitis (4.3%). Labral pathology was the most common intraarticular finding (overall:34.3%; partial tear:15.7%, complete tear:15.7%), most frequent at the anterosuperior position (81.8%). Cartilage defects (1.4%), intraarticular neoplasia (1.4%), and tear of the femoral head ligament (2.8%) were rarely found. Synovitis and loose bodies were not observed. Cam-(37.1%) and pincer-configurations (47.1%) were common while hip dysplasia was rare (5.7%).

conclusionMRI in children and adolescents with hip pain should be done primarily without intraarticular contrast administration since most cases show an extraarticular pain reason or no diagnosis detectable with MRI.

Indexed as

ArthralgiaContrast MediaHip JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentArthrographyChildFemaleHumansJoint DiseasesMaleReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaApophysitisChildrenHipIntraarticular contrastLabral tearsMRI

Identifiers

PMID38206356
PMCPMC11093865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.