Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38206341›Full record

Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2024

Comparative analysis of pelvic floor muscle training and Pilates in managing urinary incontinence among postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial.

Sabrina Gonzaga, Raphael Gonçalves de Oliveira, Letícia Lussi Dutra, Letícia Siqueira Oliveira, Laís Campos de Oliveira

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sabrina GonzagaHealth Science Center, Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná (UENP), Alameda Padre Magno, Jacarezinho, Paraná, 86400-000, Brazil. sa_gonzaga@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3915-7120
Raphael Gonçalves de OliveiraHealth Science Center, Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná (UENP), Alameda Padre Magno, Jacarezinho, Paraná, 86400-000, Brazil.
Letícia Lussi DutraHealth Science Center, Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná (UENP), Alameda Padre Magno, Jacarezinho, Paraná, 86400-000, Brazil.
Letícia Siqueira OliveiraHealth Science Center, Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná (UENP), Alameda Padre Magno, Jacarezinho, Paraná, 86400-000, Brazil.
Laís Campos de OliveiraHealth Science Center, Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná (UENP), Alameda Padre Magno, Jacarezinho, Paraná, 86400-000, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThis study is aimed at comparing the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and Pilates on the improvement of urinary incontinence (UI), strength, and endurance of the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs), and the impact of UI on the quality of life in postmenopausal women.

methodsForty postmenopausal women were randomly divided in to two groups: PFMT (n = 20) and Pilates (n = 20). The participants were followed for 12 weeks, three times a week on nonconsecutive days. UI was assessed using the pad test and the voiding diary, PFM strength and resistance using bidigital assessment and manometry, and the impact of UI on quality of life using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), before and after the 3-month treatment.

resultsThere was a significant intra-group improvement in both groups for the pad test, mean daily urinary loss, and ICIQ-SF. The strength was significantly improved only in the PFMT group, and the endurance in both groups. Peak strength manometry was significantly improved only in the Pilates group, and the mean strength manometry in both groups. There was also an improvement in both groups for peak endurance manometry and mean endurance manometry. In the inter-group comparison, there was a significant improvement only in muscle strength, which was positive for group.

conclusionsThere was no difference between Pilates and PFMT for the management of women in post-menopause with stress urinary incontinence, provided that voluntary contraction of the PFMs is performed. However, further randomized clinical trials need to be carried out.

Indexed as

Urinary IncontinenceUrinary Incontinence, StressExercise TherapyFemaleHumansPelvic FloorPostmenopauseQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeExercisePelvic floor muscle trainingPilatesPost-menopauseStress urinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID38206341
OpenAlexW4390744108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.